Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33519064›Full record

ArticleGlobal biogeochemical cycles2021

Stream Dissolved Organic Matter in Permafrost Regions Shows Surprising Compositional Similarities but Negative Priming and Nutrient Effects.

Ethan Wologo, Sarah Shakil, Scott Zolkos, Sadie Textor, Stephanie Ewing, Jane Klassen, Robert G M Spencer, David C Podgorski, Suzanne E Tank, Michelle A Baker and 18 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global biogeochemical cycles, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

28 authors at 14 institutions in 8 countries.

Ethan WologoDepartment of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences Montana State University Bozeman MT USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9352-6401
Sarah ShakilDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8877-4830
Scott ZolkosDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9945-6945
Sadie TextorDepartment of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Science and National High Magnetic Field Laboratory Geochemistry Group Florida State University Tallahassee FL USA.
Stephanie EwingDepartment of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences Montana State University Bozeman MT USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0713-4266
Jane KlassenDepartment of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences Montana State University Bozeman MT USA.
Robert G M SpencerDepartment of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Science and National High Magnetic Field Laboratory Geochemistry Group Florida State University Tallahassee FL USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0777-0748
David C PodgorskiDepartment of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Science and National High Magnetic Field Laboratory Geochemistry Group Florida State University Tallahassee FL USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1070-5923
Suzanne E TankDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton Alberta Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5371-6577
Michelle A BakerDepartment of Biology and Ecology Center Utah State University Logan UT USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7188-8639
Jonathan A O'DonnellArctic Network National Parks Service Anchorage AK USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7031-9808
Kimberly P WicklandWater Resources Mission Area USGS Boulder CO USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6400-0590
Sydney S W FoksWater Resources Mission Area USGS Boulder CO USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7668-9735
Jay P ZarnetskeDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences Michigan State University East Lansing MI USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7194-5245
Joseph Lee-CullinDepartment of Earth and Environmental Sciences Michigan State University East Lansing MI USA.
Futing LiuState Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China.
Yuanhe YangState Key Laboratory of Vegetation and Environmental Change, Institute of Botany Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5399-4606
Pirkko KortelainenFinnish Environment Institute SYKE Joensuu Finland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1448-0688
Jaana KolehmainenFinnish Environment Institute SYKE Joensuu Finland.
Joshua F DeanDepartment of Earth Sciences Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9058-7076
Jorien E VonkDepartment of Earth Sciences Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam Amsterdam Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1206-5878
Robert M HolmesWoods Hole Research Center Woods Hole MA USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6413-9154
Gilles PinayEnvironnement-Ville-Société (UMR5600) - Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) Lyon France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0731-8655
Michaela M PowellDepartment of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences Montana State University Bozeman MT USA.
Jansen HoweDepartment of Plant and Wildlife Sciences Brigham Young University Provo UT USA.
Rebecca J FreiDepartment of Plant and Wildlife Sciences Brigham Young University Provo UT USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4272-0474
Samuel P BratsmanDepartment of Plant and Wildlife Sciences Brigham Young University Provo UT USA.
Benjamin W AbbottDepartment of Plant and Wildlife Sciences Brigham Young University Provo UT USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5861-3481
Brigham Young University · USMontana State University · USFlorida State University · USChinese Academy of Sciences · CNEnvironmental and Water Resources Engineering · ILFinnish Environment Institute · FIMichigan State University · USUniversity of Alberta · CAWoodwell Climate Research Center · USCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRNational Park Service · USUniversity of Liverpool · GBUtah State University · USVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

Research Core (Developmental Research Project Program)P20GM103474 · NIGMS · MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - BOZEMAN · PI Jeffrey Good · 2012 to 2026
$60.0M
Translational Biomarkers CoreP20GM104417 · NIGMS · MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - BOZEMAN · PI ADAMS, ALEXANDRA K. · 2014 to 2023
$23.1M
Tracking and Evaluation CoreU54GM115371 · NIGMS · MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - BOZEMAN · PI QUINN, MARK T, RASMUS, STACY M. · 2016 to 2020
$20.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103474NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM104417NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM115371
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Permafrost degradation is delivering bioavailable dissolved organic matter (DOM) and inorganic nutrients to surface water networks. While these permafrost subsidies represent a small portion of total fluvial DOM and nutrient fluxes, they could influence food webs and net ecosystem carbon balance via priming or nutrient effects that destabilize background DOM. We investigated how addition of biolabile carbon (acetate) and inorganic nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) affected DOM decomposition with 28-day incubations. We incubated late-summer stream water from 23 locations nested in seven northern or high-altitude regions in Asia, Europe, and North America. DOM loss ranged from 3% to 52%, showing a variety of longitudinal patterns within stream networks. DOM optical properties varied widely, but DOM showed compositional similarity based on Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FT-ICR MS) analysis. Addition of acetate and nutrients decreased bulk DOM mineralization (i.e., negative priming), with more negative effects on biodegradable DOM but neutral or positive effects on stable DOM. Unexpectedly, acetate and nutrients triggered breakdown of colored DOM (CDOM), with median decreases of 1.6% in the control and 22% in the amended treatment. Additionally, the uptake of added acetate was strongly limited by nutrient availability across sites. These findings suggest that biolabile DOM and nutrients released from degrading permafrost may decrease background DOM mineralization but alter stoichiometry and light conditions in receiving waterbodies. We conclude that priming and nutrient effects are coupled in northern aquatic ecosystems and that quantifying two-way interactions between DOM properties and environmental conditions could resolve conflicting observations about the drivers of DOM in permafrost zone waterways.

Indexed as

carbon cyclingcryosphere and high‐latitude processesnutrients and nutrient cyclingpermafrostriversthermokarst

Identifiers

PMID33519064
PMCPMC7816262
OpenAlexW3100943079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.