Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33518869›Full record

ArticlePersonality and individual differences2021

Fearing the disease or the vaccine: The case of COVID-19.

Linda C Karlsson, Anna Soveri, Stephan Lewandowsky, Linnea Karlsson, Hasse Karlsson, Saara Nolvi, Max Karukivi, Mikael Lindfelt, Jan Antfolk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Personality and individual differences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 247 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
247citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

247 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article

187 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Linda C KarlssonDepartment of Psychology, Åbo Akademi University, Finland.
Anna SoveriFinnBrain Birth Cohort Study, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, Finland.
Stephan LewandowskySchool of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, United Kingdom.
Linnea KarlssonFinnBrain Birth Cohort Study, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, Finland.
Hasse KarlssonFinnBrain Birth Cohort Study, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, Finland.
Saara NolviFinnBrain Birth Cohort Study, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, Finland.
Max KarukiviFinnBrain Birth Cohort Study, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Turku, Finland.
Mikael LindfeltDepartment of Theological Ethics, Åbo Akademi University, Finland.
Jan AntfolkDepartment of Psychology, Åbo Akademi University, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As studies indicate that people perceive COVID-19 as a threatening disease, the demand for a vaccine against the disease could be expected to be high. Vaccine safety concerns might nevertheless outweigh the perceived disease risks when an individual decides whether or not to accept the vaccine. We investigated the role of perceived risk of COVID-19 (i.e., perceived likelihood of infection, perceived disease severity, and disease-related worry) and perceived safety of a prospective vaccine against COVID-19 in predicting intentions to accept a COVID-19 vaccine. Three Finnish samples were surveyed: 825 parents of small children, 205 individuals living in an area with suboptimal vaccination coverage, and 1325 Facebook users nationwide. As points of reference, we compared the perceptions of COVID-19 to those of influenza and measles. COVID-19 was perceived as a threatening disease-more so than influenza and measles. The strongest predictor of COVID-19 vaccination intentions was trusting the safety of the potential vaccine. Those perceiving COVID-19 as a severe disease were also slightly more intent on taking a COVID-19 vaccine. Informing the public about the safety of a forthcoming COVID-19 vaccine should be the focus for health authorities aiming to achieve a high vaccine uptake.

Indexed as

CoronavirusCOVID-19Perceived riskPerceived vaccine safetyVaccination intentionsVaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID33518869
PMCPMC7832025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.