Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33518556›Full record

Observational studyInternal medicine (Tokyo, Japan)2021

Multidisciplinary Team Care Delays the Initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in Diabetes: A Five-year Prospective, Single-center Study.

Jun Ino, Eri Kasama, Mio Kodama, Keitaro Sato, Hitoshi Eizumi, Youichiro Kawashima, Maki Sekiguchi, Tomoko Fujiwara, Aya Yamazaki, Chie Suzuki and 3 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jun InoDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Center, Toda Central General Hospital, Japan.
Eri KasamaDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Center, Toda Central General Hospital, Japan.
Mio KodamaDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Center, Toda Central General Hospital, Japan.
Keitaro SatoDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Center, Toda Central General Hospital, Japan.
Hitoshi EizumiDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Center, Toda Central General Hospital, Japan.
Youichiro KawashimaDepartment of Nephrology, Kidney Center, Toda Central General Hospital, Japan.
Maki SekiguchiDepartment of Nursing, Kidney Center, Toda Central General Hospital, Japan.
Tomoko FujiwaraDepartment of Nutrition, Toda Central General Hospital, Japan.
Aya YamazakiDepartment of Nutrition, Toda Central General Hospital, Japan.
Chie SuzukiDepartment of Pharmacy, Toda Central General Hospital, Japan.
Shuji InaDepartment of Pharmacy, Toda Central General Hospital, Japan.
Astushi OkumaDepartment of Rehabilitation, Toda Central General Hospital, Japan.
Kosaku NittaDepartment of Nephrology, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Japan.
Hakodate Central General Hospital · JPTokyo Women's Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective Although recent reports have highlighted the benefits of multidisciplinary team care (MTC) for chronic kidney disease (CKD) in slowing the progress of renal insufficiency, its long-term effects have not been evaluated for patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). We compared the renal survival rate between MTC and conservative care (CC). Methods In this five-year, single-center, prospective, observational study, we examined 24 patients (mean age 65.5±12.1 years old, men/women 18/6) with DM-induced CKD stage ≥3 in an MTC clinic. The control group included 24 random patients with DM (mean age 61.0±12.8 years old, men/women 22/2) who received CC. MTC was provided by a nephrologist and medical staff, and CC was provided by a nephrologist. Results In total, 10 MTC and 20 CC patients experienced renal events [creatinine doubling, initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT), or death due to end-stage CKD]. During the five-year observation period, there were significantly fewer renal events in the MTC group than in the CC group according to the cumulative incidence method (p=0.006). Compared to CC, MTC significantly reduced the need for urgent initiation of hemodialysis (relative risk reduction 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.107-0.964). On a multivariate analysis, MTC (hazard ratio [HR], 0.434, 95% CI 0.200-0.939) and the slope of the estimated glomerular filtration rate during the first year (HR, 0.429 per 1 mL/min/m

Indexed as

Diabetes MellitusRenal Insufficiency, ChronicAgedDisease ProgressionFemaleGlomerular Filtration RateHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Care TeamProspective StudiesRenal Replacement Therapychronic kidney diseasediabetic nephropathyend-stage renal diseasemultidisciplinary team carerenal replacement therapyurgent initiation of renal replacement therapy

Identifiers

PMID33518556
PMCPMC8313920
OpenAlexW3127595711

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.