Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33518521›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Psychological aspects in patients with advanced cancer receiving lifelong systemic treatment: protocol for a scoping review.

Evie E M Kolsteren, Esther Deuning-Smit, Judith B Prins, Winette T A van der Graaf, Carla M L van Herpen, Sophie Lebel, Belinda Thewes, Linda Kwakkenbos, José A E Custers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Evie E M Kolsteren *Medical Psychology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands evie.kolsteren@radboudumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-2590-9352
Esther Deuning-Smit *Medical Psychology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Judith B PrinsMedical Psychology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Winette T A van der GraafMedical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Carla M L van HerpenMedical Oncology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sophie LebelSchool of Psychology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Belinda ThewesSchool of Psychology, Sydney University Medical Society, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Linda KwakkenbosClinical Psychology, Radboud University Behavioural Science Institute, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
José A E CustersMedical Psychology, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud university medical center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA better understanding of the molecular, genetic and immunological characteristics of cancer and the introduction of new systemic treatment regimens in the last decades, has led to better treatment outcomes and increased survival rates for patients with previously short lived cancers. However, there is no uniform description to refer to this growing group of patients with advanced cancer who now respond to new systemic treatments for longer periods. Furthermore, little is known about the unique psychological challenges these patients face, living with ongoing uncertainty about the course of their disease and life expectancy. The objective of this scoping review is to identify the psychological aspects experienced by, and the definitions used to refer to patients with advanced cancer receiving lifelong systemic treatment. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review will be among the first to summarise literature on the psychological issues in the growing group of advanced cancer patients undergoing long-term systemic treatment. Articles will be retrieved from six databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, PsycINFO, CINAHL and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) and reviewed for eligibility by two investigators independently. Definitions and psychological challenges will be extracted and narratively summarised following a descriptive approach. Furthermore, results will contribute in providing a uniform definition for this patient group, and help to identify knowledge gaps to give direction to further research in this field. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: No ethical approval is required. The results of the scoping review will be submitted for publication to a scientific journal and presented at relevant conferences.

Indexed as

Long-Term CareNeoplasmsHumansResearch DesignScoping Reviews as Topicadult oncologymental healthpalliative care

Identifiers

PMID33518521
PMCPMC7852939

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.