Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33518345›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2021

Effects of in ovo probiotic administration on the incidence of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli in broilers and an evaluation on its virulence and antimicrobial resistance properties.

Tianmin Li, Claudia D Castañeda, Julio Miotto, Chris McDaniel, Aaron S Kiess, Li Zhang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Avian PathogenicAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Isolation and Characterization ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  9. Avian PathogenicPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Non-Antibiotics Strategies to ControlAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tianmin LiDepartment of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, 39762, USA.
Claudia D CastañedaDepartment of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, 39762, USA.
Julio MiottoDepartment of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, 39762, USA.
Chris McDanielDepartment of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, 39762, USA.
Aaron S KiessDepartment of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, 39762, USA.
Li ZhangDepartment of Poultry Science, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, 39762, USA. Electronic address: l.zhang@msstate.edu.
Mississippi State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Avian pathogenic Escherichia coli (APEC) causes colibacillosis in poultry, which has been traditionally controlled by the prophylactic in-feed supplementation of antibiotics. However, antibiotics are being removed from poultry diets owing to the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. Therefore, alternatives to control APEC are required. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of in ovo inoculation of probiotics on the incidence of APEC in broilers and evaluate the virulence and antimicrobial resistance properties of the APEC isolates. On embryonic day 18, 4 in ovo treatments (T) were applied: T1 (Marek's vaccine [MV]), T2 (MV and Lactobacillus animalis), T3 (MV and Lactobacillus reuteri), and T4 (MV and Lactobacillus rhamnosus). A total of 180 male broilers per treatment were randomly placed in 10 pens. The heart, liver, spleen, and yolk sac were collected on day 0, 14, 28, and 42. Presumptive E. coli isolates were confirmed by real-time PCR. The positive isolates were screened for the APEC-related genes (iroN, ompT, hlyF, iss, and iutA), and E. coli isolates containing one or more of these genes were identified as APEC-like strains. A total of 144 APEC-like isolates were isolated from 548 organ samples. No differences (P > 0.05) among treatments were observed for the incidence of APEC-like strains in all organs when averaged over sampling days. However, when averaged over treatments, the incidence in the heart, liver, and yolk sac was different among sampling days; a significant increase was observed in these organs on day 14 compared with day 0. Twenty-five antimicrobial resistance genes were evaluated for all APEC-like isolates, and 92.4% of the isolates carried at least one antimicrobial resistance gene. Thirty-seven isolates were then selected for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; MDR strains accounted for 37.8% of the isolates. In conclusion, the in ovo inoculation of a single probiotic strain did not confer protection against APEC strains in broilers. The high prevalence of MDR isolates indicates that further research on antibiotic alternatives is required to prevent APEC infections in broilers.

Indexed as

Escherichia coli InfectionsPoultry DiseasesProbioticsAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChickensDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliIncidenceLactobacillusMaleVirulenceAnti-Bacterial Agentsin ovo inoculationLactobacillusmultidrug-resistantreal-time PCR detectionvirulence gene

Identifiers

PMID33518345
PMCPMC7936151
OpenAlexW3111582856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.