Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33518344›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2021

Research Note: Antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter species isolated from chickens near Ulaanbaatar city, Mongolia.

Zolzaya Byambajav, Erdenebat Bulgan, Yuji Hirai, Momoko Nakayama, Misaki Tanaka, Yurika Nitta, Akio Suzuki, Takashi Umemura, Bold Altankhuu, Alimaa Tsagaan and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prevalence of antimicrobial-resistantOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026
    Article
  2. Antimicrobial Susceptibility ofVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Zolzaya ByambajavUlaanbaatar Veterinary Department, Laboratory of Veterinary Sanitation and Hygiene, Ulaanbaatar 16050, Mongolia; Ulaanbaatar Veterinary Department, Laboratory of Diagnostic and Surveillance, Ulaanbaatar 16050, Mongolia.
Erdenebat BulganUlaanbaatar Veterinary Department, Laboratory of Veterinary Sanitation and Hygiene, Ulaanbaatar 16050, Mongolia; Ulaanbaatar Veterinary Department, Laboratory of Diagnostic and Surveillance, Ulaanbaatar 16050, Mongolia.
Yuji HiraiLaboratory of Veterinary Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Graduate School of Infectious Diseases, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818 Japan.
Momoko NakayamaLaboratory of Veterinary Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Graduate School of Infectious Diseases, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818 Japan.
Misaki TanakaLaboratory of Veterinary Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Graduate School of Infectious Diseases, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818 Japan.
Yurika NittaLaboratory of Veterinary Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Graduate School of Infectious Diseases, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818 Japan.
Akio SuzukiLaboratory of Veterinary Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Graduate School of Infectious Diseases, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818 Japan.
Takashi UmemuraProject Office of Japan International Cooperation Agency, Mongolian University of Life Science, Ulaanbaatar 17024, Mongolia.
Bold AltankhuuLaboratory of Infectious Disease and Immunology, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Mongolian University of Life Science, Ulaanbaatar 11000, Mongolia.
Alimaa TsagaanLaboratory of Infectious Disease and Immunology, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Mongolian University of Life Science, Ulaanbaatar 11000, Mongolia.
Batbaatar VanaabaatarLaboratory of Infectious Disease and Immunology, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Mongolian University of Life Science, Ulaanbaatar 11000, Mongolia.
Erdenebaatar JanchivdorjLaboratory of Infectious Disease and Immunology, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Mongolian University of Life Science, Ulaanbaatar 11000, Mongolia.
Nyam-Osor PurevdorjSchool of Veterinary Medicine, Mongolian University of Life Science, Ulaanbaatar 17024, Mongolia.
Narantuya AyushjavUlaanbaatar Veterinary Department, Laboratory of Veterinary Sanitation and Hygiene, Ulaanbaatar 16050, Mongolia; Ulaanbaatar Veterinary Department, Laboratory of Diagnostic and Surveillance, Ulaanbaatar 16050, Mongolia.
Takeshi YamasakiLaboratory of Veterinary Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Graduate School of Infectious Diseases, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818 Japan.
Motohiro HoriuchiLaboratory of Veterinary Hygiene, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Graduate School of Infectious Diseases, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 060-0818 Japan; Global Station for Zoonosis Control, Global Institute for Collaborative Research and Education, Hokkaido University, Sapporo 001-0020, Japan. Electronic address: horiuchi@vetmed.hokudai.ac.jp.
Mongolian University of Life Sciences · MNHokkaido University · JPJapan International Cooperation Agency · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been no report on the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in farm animals in Mongolia. To uncover the prevalence of Campylobacter spp. in chickens in Mongolia and their antimicrobial resistance, in this study, we isolated and characterized Campylobacter spp. from chickens in Mongolia. We collected 71 cloacal swabs of chickens from 5 farms including 4 layer farms and one broiler farm near Ulaanbaatar city and isolated 25 Campylobacter jejuni and 6 Campylobacter coli isolates. All isolates were resistant to tetracycline, and 3 C. coli isolates were resistant to erythromycin. The C. coli isolates possessed either the erm(B) gene or nucleotide substitution at nt 2,075 of 23S rDNA, both of which are known to be associated with erythromycin resistance. Sixteen of the 31 C. jejuni/C. coli isolates (51.6%) were resistant to nalidixic acid and fluoroquinolones. All the fluoroquinolone-resistant isolates possessed amino acid substitution from threonine to isoleucine at codon 86 (nucleotide substitution: ACA to ATA). Multilocus sequence typing and phylogenetic analyses showed a variation in C. jejuni/C. coli in chickens in Mongolia. In addition, some of the C. jejuni isolates seemed to be phylogenetically close to isolates in Asian and Oceanian countries. This is the first report on the characterization of antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. in farm animals in Mongolia and is valuable for implementation of measures for a prudent use of antimicrobials in farm animals.

Indexed as

Anti-Infective AgentsCampylobacterCampylobacter coliCampylobacter InfectionsCampylobacter jejuniAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsChickensDrug Resistance, BacterialMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMongoliaPhylogenyAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Infective Agentsantimicrobial resistanceCampylobacterfluoroquinoloneMongolia

Identifiers

PMID33518344
PMCPMC7936208
OpenAlexW3111952339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.