Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33518327›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2021

Development of a wild-type Escherichia coli environmental bloom model to evaluate alternatives to formaldehyde fumigation in broiler chicken hatch cabinets.

B D Graham, C M Selby, L E Graham, K D Teague, G Tellez-Isaias, B M Hargis, C N Vuong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

B D GrahamDepartment of Poultry Science, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701, USA.
C M SelbyDepartment of Poultry Science, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701, USA.
L E GrahamDepartment of Poultry Science, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701, USA.
K D TeagueDepartment of Poultry Science, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701, USA.
G Tellez-IsaiasDepartment of Poultry Science, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701, USA.
B M HargisDepartment of Poultry Science, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701, USA.
C N VuongDepartment of Poultry Science, Division of Agriculture, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville 72701, USA. Electronic address: vuong@uark.edu.
University of Arkansas System · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Horizontal transmission of opportunistic Escherichia coli during hatch can have detrimental effects on early performance, particularly as pioneer colonizers. Commercially, formaldehyde is often applied in the United States to combat the bacterial bloom that occurs inside of the hatching environment. The purpose of these experiments was to develop a replicable E. coli horizontal challenge model to evaluate alternatives to formaldehyde sanitation applied to the hatching environment. In experiment 1, two trials were conducted for 2 wild-type (WT) E. coli isolates (isolate 1 [I1] or isolate 2 [I2]) to determine the appropriate in ovo challenge dose and day of embryogenesis (DOE) for challenge administration. In experiment 1 trial 1, the most appropriate inoculation dose and time point were determined to be 10

Indexed as

ChickensDisinfectionEscherichia coliOvumAnimalsFormaldehydeFumigationModels, BiologicalFormaldehydebroilerEscherichia colihatcherin ovomodel

Identifiers

PMID33518327
PMCPMC7936173
OpenAlexW3113487879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.