Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33518309›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2021

In pursuit of a better broiler: growth, efficiency, and mortality of 16 strains of broiler chickens.

Stephanie Torrey, Mohsen Mohammadigheisar, Midian Nascimento Dos Santos, Daniel Rothschild, Lauren C Dawson, Zhenzhen Liu, Elijah G Kiarie, A Michelle Edwards, Ira Mandell, Niel Karrow and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Impact of Growth Rate on the Welfare of Broilers.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Stephanie TorreyDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada; Campbell Centre for the Study of Animal Welfare, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada. Electronic address: storrey@uoguelph.ca.
Mohsen MohammadigheisarDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Midian Nascimento Dos SantosDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada; Campbell Centre for the Study of Animal Welfare, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Daniel RothschildDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada; Campbell Centre for the Study of Animal Welfare, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Lauren C DawsonDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada; Campbell Centre for the Study of Animal Welfare, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Zhenzhen LiuDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada; Campbell Centre for the Study of Animal Welfare, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Elijah G KiarieDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
A Michelle EdwardsOntario Agricultural College, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Ira MandellDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Niel KarrowDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Dan TulpanDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.
Tina M WidowskiDepartment of Animal Biosciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada; Campbell Centre for the Study of Animal Welfare, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To meet the growing consumer demand for chicken meat, the poultry industry has selected broiler chickens for increasing efficiency and breast yield. While this high productivity means affordable and consistent product, it has come at a cost to broiler welfare. There has been increasing advocacy and consumer pressure on primary breeders, producers, processors, and retailers to improve the welfare of the billions of chickens processed annually. Several small-scale studies have reported better welfare outcomes for slower-growing strains compared to fast-growing, conventional strains. However, these studies often housed birds with range access or used strains with vastly different growth rates. Additionally, there may be traits other than growth, such as body conformation, that influence welfare. As the global poultry industries consider the implications of using slower growing strains, there was a need for a comprehensive, multidisciplinary examination of broiler chickens with a wide range of genotypes differing in growth rate and other phenotypic traits. To meet this need, our team designed a study to benchmark data on conventional and slower-growing strains of broiler chickens reared in standardized laboratory conditions. Over a 2-year period, we studied 7,528 broilers from 16 different genetic strains. In this paper, we compare the growth, efficiency, and mortality of broilers to one of two target weights (TW): 2.1 kg (TW1) and 3.2 kg (TW2). We categorized strains by their growth rate to TW2 as conventional (CONV), fastest-slow strains (FAST), moderate-slow strains (MOD), and slowest-slow strains (SLOW). When incubated, hatched, housed, managed, and fed the same, the categories of strains differed in body weights, growth rates, feed intake, and feed efficiency. At 48 d of age, strains in the CONV category were 835 to 1,264 g heavier than strains in the other categories. By TW2, differences in body weights and feed intake resulted in a 22 to 43-point difference in feed conversion ratios. Categories of strains did not differ in their overall mortality rates.

Indexed as

ChickensDietAnimalsBody WeightEnergy MetabolismGenotypeMortalitySpecies Specificitybroilerfeed efficiencymortalityslow growingwelfare

Identifiers

PMID33518309
PMCPMC7936194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.