Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33518095›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2021

Genome-wide analysis reveals the patterns of genetic diversity and population structure of 8 Italian local chicken breeds.

F Cendron, S Mastrangelo, M Tolone, F Perini, E Lasagna, M Cassandro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

F CendronDepartment of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, PD, Italy. Electronic address: filippo.cendron@unipd.it.
S MastrangeloDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, University of Palermo 90128 Palermo, PA, Italy.
M ToloneDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Forest Sciences, University of Palermo 90128 Palermo, PA, Italy.
F PeriniDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia 06121 Perugia, PG, Italy.
E LasagnaDepartment of Agricultural, Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Perugia 06121 Perugia, PG, Italy.
M CassandroDepartment of Agronomy, Food, Natural Resources, Animals and Environment, University of Padova, 35020 Legnaro, PD, Italy.
University of Padua · ITUniversity of Palermo · ITUniversity of Perugia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this study was to conduct a genome-wide comparative analysis of 8 local Italian chicken breeds (Ermellinata di Rovigo, Millefiori di Lonigo [PML], Polverara Bianca, Polverara Nera, Padovana, Pepoi [PPP], Robusta Lionata, and Robusta Maculata), all under a conservation plan, to understand their genetic diversity and population structure. A total of 152 animals were analyzed using the Affymetrix Axiom 600 K Chicken Genotyping Array. The levels of genetic diversity were highest and lowest in PML and PPP, respectively. The results of genomic inbreeding based on runs of homozygosity (ROH; F

Indexed as

Genetic VariationGenomeAnimalsBreedingChickensCluster AnalysisGenome-Wide Association StudyHomozygoteInbreedingItalyPolymorphism, Single Nucleotidegenetic diversitylocal poultry breedpopulation structureruns of homozygositySNP marker

Identifiers

PMID33518095
PMCPMC7858015
OpenAlexW3101172290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.