Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33518084›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2021

Fatty acid profile, oxidative status, and content of volatile organic compounds in raw and cooked meat of different chicken strains.

A Cartoni Mancinelli, E Silletti, S Mattioli, A Dal Bosco, B Sebastiani, L Menchetti, A Koot, S van Ruth, C Castellini

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

A Cartoni MancinelliDepartment of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy. Electronic address: acartonimancinelli@gmail.com.
E SillettiDepartment of Authenticity and Nutrients, Wageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
S MattioliDepartment of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
A Dal BoscoDepartment of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
B SebastianiDepartment of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnology, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
L MenchettiDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
A KootDepartment of Authenticity and Nutrients, Wageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
S van RuthDepartment of Authenticity and Nutrients, Wageningen Food Safety Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
C CastelliniDepartment of Agricultural, Environmental and Food Science, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
University of Perugia · ITWageningen University & Research · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chicken meat is rich in unsaturated fatty acids. Therefore, it is more susceptible to lipid oxidation and production of volatile organic compounds (VOC). In this study, we evaluated the fatty acids, antioxidants, and VOC profiles of raw and cooked meat samples derived from 4 strains of chicken differing in their growth rates, which were as follows: slow-growing (SG, Leghorn), medium-growing (MG, Hubbard and Naked Neck), and fast-growing (FG, Ross). The VOC profile of meat was measured using proton-transfer reaction-mass spectrometry (PTR-MS). The VOC were identified using PTR-time of flight-MS (PTR-ToF-MS). The data were analyzed using both univariate and multivariate models. Twenty main VOC were identified, which were classified into the following chemical categories: aldehydes, alkadienes, alkenes, furans, amides, alcohols, and other compounds. Our results revealed that the chicken genotype and the method of cooking strongly influenced the VOC profile of the meat. Identifying the relationships between these traits allowed us to highlight the trade-off of the main substrates such as n-3 and n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA), protective substances (antioxidants), and degradation products (VOC) of the poultry meat produced during cooking. The extent of VOC production and n-3 loss was found to be higher for the SG genotype. Reduction of n-6 was higher in MG, whereas small losses in antioxidants and PUFA were observed in the FG genotype, consequently, resulting in the lowest production of VOC. The SG and MG are genotypes more active from a kinetic point of view respect to the FG ones. For this reason, in the FG genotypes, the antioxidants are less involved in the oxidative stress induced by the movement; thus, they were available to protect the lipid of the meat during the cooking process. These results suggested that the use of SG and MG genotypes requires a specific dietary protocol (i.e., increasing the antioxidants content) to counteract the lipid oxidations in all the phases: in vivo, postmortem, and during/after cooking.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntioxidantsChickensCookingFatty AcidsLipid PeroxidationMeatOxidative StressPrincipal Component AnalysisThiobarbituric Acid Reactive SubstancesTocopherolsVolatile Organic CompoundsAntioxidantsFatty AcidsThiobarbituric Acid Reactive SubstancesTocopherolsVolatile Organic Compoundsantioxidantcookingfatty acid profilegenotypevolatile organic compound

Identifiers

PMID33518084
PMCPMC7858157
OpenAlexW3097113613

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.