Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33518075›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2021

The differences in intestinal growth and microorganisms between male and female ducks.

Xuefei Chen, Bo Hu, Liansi Huang, Lumin Cheng, Hehe Liu, Jiwei Hu, Shenqiang Hu, Chunchun Han, Hua He, Bo Kang and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 49% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effects of DifferentMicroorganisms · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xuefei ChenWork for Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Sichuan Agriculture University, Chengdu, China.
Bo HuWork for Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Sichuan Agriculture University, Chengdu, China.
Liansi HuangWork for Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Sichuan Agriculture University, Chengdu, China.
Lumin ChengWork for Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Sichuan Agriculture University, Chengdu, China.
Hehe LiuWork for Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Sichuan Agriculture University, Chengdu, China.
Jiwei HuWork for Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Sichuan Agriculture University, Chengdu, China.
Shenqiang HuWork for Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Sichuan Agriculture University, Chengdu, China.
Chunchun HanWork for Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Sichuan Agriculture University, Chengdu, China.
Hua HeWork for Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Sichuan Agriculture University, Chengdu, China.
Bo KangWork for Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Sichuan Agriculture University, Chengdu, China.
Hengyong XuWork for Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Sichuan Agriculture University, Chengdu, China.
Rongping ZhangWork for Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Sichuan Agriculture University, Chengdu, China.
Jiwen WangWork for Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Sichuan Agriculture University, Chengdu, China.
Liang LiWork for Farm Animal Genetic Resources Exploration and Innovation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, Institute of Animal Genetics and Breeding, Sichuan Agriculture University, Chengdu, China. Electronic address: liliang@sicau.edu.cn.
Sichuan Agricultural University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are great differences in physiological and biological functions between animals of different sexes. However, whether there is a consensus between sexes in duck intestinal development and microorganisms is still unknown. The current study used Nonghua ducks to estimate the effect of sex on the intestine by evaluating differences in intestinal growth indexes and microorganisms. The intestines of male and female ducks were sampled at 2, 5, and 10 wk from the duodenum, jejunum, ileum, and cecum. Then, the intestinal length and weight were measured, the morphology was observed with HE staining, and the intestinal content was analyzed by 16S rRNA sequencing. The results showed that male ducks have shorter intestinal lengths with higher relative weights/relative lengths. The values of jejunal villus height (VH)/crypt depth (CD) of female ducks were significantly higher at 2 wk, whereas the jejunal VH/CD was significantly lower at 10 wk. There was obvious separation of microorganisms in each intestinal segment of ducks of different sexes at the 3 time periods. The dominant phyla at different stages were Firmicutea, Proteobacteria, Bacteroidetes, and Actinobacteria. The duodenal Chao index at the genus level of male ducks was significantly higher at 10 wk than that of female ducks. Significantly different genera were found only in the jejunum, and the abundances of Escherichia_Shigella, Pseudomonas, Clostridium_sensu_stricto_1, Sphingomonas, and Desulfovibrio in male ducks were higher than those in female ducks, whereas the abundance of Rothia was lower, and the abundance of viral infectious diseases, lipid metabolism, metabolism of terpenoids and polyketides, parasitic infectious diseases, xenobiotic biodegradation and metabolism, cardiovascular disease, and metabolism of other amino acids in male ducks were higher than that in female ducks, whereas gene folding, sorting and degradation pathways, and nucleotide metabolism were lower. This study provides a basic reference for the intestinal development and microbial symbiosis of ducks of different sexes.

Indexed as

DucksSex CharacteristicsAnimalsFemaleIntestine, SmallMaleRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sduckintestinemicroorganismsex

Identifiers

PMID33518075
PMCPMC7858134
OpenAlexW3097820026

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.