Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33518064›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2021

A one-step closed-tube enzyme-activated blocked probe assay based on SNP for rapid detection of Salmonella Pullorum.

Junping Wen, Hongchao Gou, Jing Liu, Hualiang Zhou, Qijie Lin, Xiaoyun Qu, Kaifeng Chen, Shaojun Wang, Haiyan Shen, Ming Liao and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Junping WenNational and Regional Joint Engineering Laboratory For Medicament of Zoonoses Prevention and Control, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Zoonoses, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Zoonoses Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Animal Vaccine Development, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China; Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China; College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Hongchao GouInstitute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Jing LiuNational and Regional Joint Engineering Laboratory For Medicament of Zoonoses Prevention and Control, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Zoonoses, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Zoonoses Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Animal Vaccine Development, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China; Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China; College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Hualiang ZhouAnimal and Plant Inspection and Quarantine Technology Center, Shenzhen 518054, China.
Qijie LinNational and Regional Joint Engineering Laboratory For Medicament of Zoonoses Prevention and Control, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Zoonoses, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Zoonoses Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Animal Vaccine Development, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China; Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China; College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Xiaoyun QuNational and Regional Joint Engineering Laboratory For Medicament of Zoonoses Prevention and Control, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Zoonoses, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Zoonoses Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Animal Vaccine Development, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China; Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China; College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Kaifeng ChenNational and Regional Joint Engineering Laboratory For Medicament of Zoonoses Prevention and Control, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Zoonoses, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Zoonoses Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Animal Vaccine Development, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China; Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China; College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Shaojun WangNational and Regional Joint Engineering Laboratory For Medicament of Zoonoses Prevention and Control, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Zoonoses, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Zoonoses Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Animal Vaccine Development, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China; Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China; College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Haiyan ShenInstitute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Ming LiaoNational and Regional Joint Engineering Laboratory For Medicament of Zoonoses Prevention and Control, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Zoonoses, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Zoonoses Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Animal Vaccine Development, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China; Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China; College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China; Institute of Animal Health, Guangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guangzhou 510640, China.
Jianmin ZhangNational and Regional Joint Engineering Laboratory For Medicament of Zoonoses Prevention and Control, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Zoonoses, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Zoonoses Prevention and Control of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou 510642, China; Key Laboratory of Animal Vaccine Development, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China; Guangdong Laboratory for Lingnan Modern Agriculture, Guangzhou 510642, China; College of Veterinary Medicine, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China. Electronic address: junfeng-v@163.com.
South China Agricultural University · CNGuangdong Academy of Agricultural Sciences · CNKey Laboratory of Guangdong Province · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum biovars Pullorum (S. Pullorum) is an infectious bacterial pathogen in the poultry industry that causes systemic pullorum disease. This disease causes great losses in terms of the clinical production and quality of chicken products in breeding farms. However, an acknowledged usable rapid detection method for its specific identification has not been reported, and it is generally difficult to distinguish from fowl typhoid caused by Salmonella enterica serovar Gallinarum biovars Gallinarum. The development of a specific and rapid detection method for this pathogen is therefore needed. In the present study, we targeted the single-nucleotide mutation position 237 of the S. Pullorum rfbS gene to develop an enzyme-activated blocked probe for its clinical rapid detection. The method displayed robust specificity and reproducibility, and it achieved minimal detection limits of 21 copies/μL of copy number and 4.53 pg/μL of genomic DNA. Compared with traditional identification and PCR methods, this method performed better for the detection of 100 clinical actual samples and without false negative results. The entire process can be accomplished in a 1-step closed-tube operation, overcomes the difficulties currently associated with S. Pullorum detection, and provides a specific and rapid method with broad application potential for SNP detection.

Indexed as

ChickensAnimalsPoultry DiseasesReproducibility of ResultsSalmonella entericaSalmonella Infections, AnimalTime Factorsenzyme-activated blocked probe (EA probe)rapid detectionSalmonella PullorumSNP

Identifiers

PMID33518064
PMCPMC7858149
OpenAlexW3100193724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.