Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33518035›Full record

ArticleValue in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research2021

Estimating a Preference-Based Index for Mental Health From the Recovering Quality of Life Measure: Valuation of Recovering Quality of Life Utility Index.

Anju Devianee Keetharuth, Donna Rowen, Jakob Bue Bjorner, John Brazier

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06412341 (A Feasibility Study to Inform an RCT to Evaluate 'Accepting Your Body After Cancer', an Online-delivered, Group-based CBT Body Image Intervention, for Women Who Have Received Treatment for Breast Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 31 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06412341 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Feasibility Study to Inform an RCT to Evaluate 'Accepting Your Body After Cancer', an Online-delivered, Group-based CBT Body Image Intervention, for Women Who Have Received Treatment for Breast Cancer

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of the West of EnglandRan2024 to 2025Enrolled120ConditionsBreast Cancer FemaleArmsAccepting your Body after Cancer, Macmillan body image booklet
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Dimensions Used in Instruments for QALY Calculation: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Psychometric evaluation of the German version of the Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL) measures in patients with affective disorders.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2023
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Psychometric assessment of EQ-5D-5L and ReQoL measures in patients with anxiety and depression: construct validity and responsiveness.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2021
    Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evaluating the cost-effectiveness of Everyday Life Rehabilitation (ELR) for individuals with serious mental illness in supported accommodation.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Effect of caregiver burden on the quality of life of informal caregivers of people with cystic fibrosis in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Article
  17. Article
  18. BMJ open · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anju Devianee KeetharuthSchool of Health of Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. Electronic address: d.keetharuth@sheffield.ac.uk.
Donna RowenSchool of Health of Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Jakob Bue BjornerOptum Patient Insights, Johnston, RI, USA; University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
John BrazierSchool of Health of Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are increasing concerns about the appropriateness of generic preference-based measures to capture health benefits in the area of mental health.

objectivesThe aim of this study is to estimate preference weights for a new measure, Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL-10), to better capture the benefits of mental healthcare.

methodsPsychometric analyses of a larger sample of mental health service users (n = 4266) using confirmatory factor analyses and item response theory were used to derive a health state classification system and inform the selection of health states for utility assessment. A valuation survey with members of the UK public representative in terms of age, sex, and region was conducted using face-to-face interviewer administered time-trade-off with props. A series of regression models were fitted to the data and the best performing model selected for the scoring algorithm.

resultsThe ReQoL-Utility Index (UI) classification system comprises 6 mental health items and 1 physical health item. Sixty-four health states were valued by 305 participants. The preferred model was a random effects model, with significant and consistent coefficients and best model fit. Estimated utilities modeled for all health states ranged from -0.195 (state worse than dead) to 1 (best possible state).

conclusionsThe development of the ReQoL-UI is based on a novel application of item response theory methods for generating the classification system and selecting health states for valuation. Conventional time-trade-off was used to elicit utility values that are modeled to enable the generation of QALYs for use in cost-utility analysis of mental health interventions.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHealth StatusHopeHumansInterpersonal RelationsLeisure ActivitiesMaleMental HealthMiddle AgedPersonal AutonomyPsychometricsmental healthpreference-based measureQALYsReQoL-10ReQoL-20

Identifiers

PMID33518035
PMCPMC7871010

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.