ArticleJournal of sport and health science2021
Muscular activity patterns in 1-legged vs. 2-legged pedaling.
Article in Journal of sport and health science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05514392 (Comparison of Electromyographic Threshold and Dynamic Balance After Single Leg Cycling Ergometer and Double Leg Cycling Ergometer Training in Healthy Adults), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Comparison of Electromyographic Threshold and Dynamic Balance After Single Leg Cycling Ergometer and Double Leg Cycling Ergometer Training in Healthy Adults
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Handlebar Width Choices Must Be Considered for Female Cyclists.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2025Article
- Profiles of muscle-specific oxygenation responses and thresholds during graded cycling incremental test.European journal of applied physiology · 2025Article
- A direct collocation framework for optimal control simulation of pedaling using OpenSim.PloS one · 2022Article
- Caution needed when interpreting muscle activity patterns during extremely low pedaling cadence.Journal of sport and health science · 2021Article
- Response to: Caution needed when interpreting muscle activity patterns during extremely low pedaling cadence.Journal of sport and health science · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOne-legged pedaling is of interest to elite cyclists and clinicians. However, muscular usage in 1-legged vs. 2-legged pedaling is not fully understood. Thus, the study was aimed to examine changes in leg muscle activation patterns between 2-legged and 1-legged pedaling.
methodsFifteen healthy young recreational cyclists performed both 1-legged and 2-legged pedaling trials at about 30 Watt per leg. Surface electromyography electrodes were placed on 10 major muscles of the left leg. Linear envelope electromyography data were integrated to quantify muscle activities for each crank cycle quadrant to evaluate muscle activation changes.
resultsOverall, the prescribed constant power requirements led to reduced downstroke crank torque and extension-related muscle activities (vastus lateralis, vastus medialis, and soleus) in 1-legged pedaling. Flexion-related muscle activities (biceps femoris long head, semitendinosus, lateral gastrocnemius, medial gastrocnemius, tensor fasciae latae, and tibialis anterior) in the upstroke phase increased to compensate for the absence of contralateral leg crank torque. During the upstroke, simultaneous increases were seen in the hamstrings and uni-articular knee extensors, and in the ankle plantarflexors and dorsiflexors. At the top of the crank cycle, greater hip flexor activity stabilized the pelvis.
conclusionThe observed changes in muscle activities are due to a variety of changes in mechanical aspects of the pedaling motion when pedaling with only 1 leg, including altered crank torque patterns without the contralateral leg, reduced pelvis stability, and increased knee and ankle stiffness during the upstroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.