Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33517916›Full record

ArticleNeurological research and practice2021

Moral distress among residents in neurology: a pilot study.

Hanna Hildesheim, Annette Rogge, Christoph Borzikowsky, Victoria Dorothea Witt, Eva Schäffer, Daniela Berg

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological research and practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Hanna Hildesheim *Department of Neurology, Kiel University, University-Hospital-Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany. h.hildesheim@gmx.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0359-250X
Annette Rogge *Institute for Experimental Medicine, Medical Ethics, Kiel University, University-Hospital-Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Christoph BorzikowskyInstitute of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Kiel University, University-Hospital-Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany.
Victoria Dorothea WittDepartment of Neurology, Segeberger Kliniken, Bad Segeberg, Germany.
Eva SchäfferDepartment of Neurology, Kiel University, University-Hospital-Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Daniela BergDepartment of Neurology, Kiel University, University-Hospital-Schleswig-Holstein, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DESegeberger Kliniken · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical progress, economization of healthcare systems, and scarcity of resources raise fundamental ethical issues. Physicians are exposed to increasing moral conflict situations, which may cause Moral Distress (MD). MD occurs when someone thinks he or she might know the morally correct action but cannot act upon this knowledge because of in- or external constraints. Correlations of MD among residents to job changes and burn-out have been shown previously. There are, however, hardly any quantitative studies about MD among physicians in Germany. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of occurrence, the level of disturbance, and reasons for MD among neurological residents in German hospitals.

methods1st qualitative phase: Open interviews on workload and ethical conflicts in everyday clinical practice were conducted with five neurological residents. Ethical principles of medical action and potential constraints that could cause MD were identified and a questionnaire designed. 2nd quantitative phase: A preliminary questionnaire was tested and evaluated by five further neurological residents. The final questionnaire consisted of 12 items and was conducted online and anonymously via e-mail or on-site as part of an unrelated resident training event at 56 sites.

resultsOne hundred seven neurological residents from 56 university/acute care and rehabilitation hospitals throughout Germany were examined (response rate of those requesting the questionnaire: 75.1%). 96.3% of the participants had experienced MD weekly (3.86, SD 1.02), because they were unable to invest the necessary time in a patient or relative consultation. Errors in medical care, which could not be communicated adequately with patients or relatives, were rated as most distressing. The most common reasons for MD were the growing numbers of patients, expectations of patient relatives, fears of legal consequences, incentives of the DRG-system, and the increasing bureaucratization requirement. 43.0% of participants mentioned they considered leaving the field of inpatient-care. 65.4% stated they would like more support in conflict situations.

conclusionMD plays an important role for neurological residents in German hospitals and has an impact on participants' consideration of changing the workplace. Important aspects are rationing (time/beds) and incentives for overdiagnosis as well as lack of internal communication culture and mentoring.

Indexed as

Moral distressResidents in neurologyWorking conditions

Identifiers

PMID33517916
PMCPMC7849144
OpenAlexW3127238623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.