ArticleTechnology in cancer research & treatment
Postoperative Radiotherapy Omitting Level Ⅳ for Locally Advanced Supraglottic and Glottic Laryngeal Carcinoma.
Article in Technology in cancer research & treatment. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Competing risk models versus traditional Cox models for prognostic factors' prediction and care recommendation in patients with advanced laryngeal squamous carcinoma: a population-based study.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2023Article
- [Study on the indication of concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced laryngeal carcinoma].Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCervical lymph nodes metastases are one of the most significant prognostic factors in patients with laryngeal carcinoma, whether treatment by surgery or by radiotherapy. The current study retrospected the postoperative radiotherapy of locally advanced supraglottic and glottic laryngeal carcinoma (at a greater risk of lymph node metastasis) to determine the effect of radiotherapy excluding cervical level Ⅳ lymph nodes.
methodsPatients of supraglottic type and glottic type were irradiated with level Ⅳ from January 2012 to June 2013, without level Ⅳ from July 2013 to December 2014, according to physicians' decision. Ninety-three patients were selective neck irradiation (SNI) of levels Ⅱ-Ⅳ (Group A) and 87 patients were SNI of levels Ⅱ and Ⅲ (Group B). The comparison between Group A and Group B was made with observation of clinical risk of recurrence and radiation complications, as well as overall survival (OS), progress-free survival (PFS) and regional nodal recurrence-free survival.
resultsNo remarkable difference was observed in the distribution of recurrence, levels of relapse, OS, PFS and regional nodal recurrence-free survival between the 2 groups (p > 0.05). Mean radiation dose at level Ⅳ, thyroid and cervical esophagus showed significant difference between the 2 therapeutic groups (p < 0.01). As regard radiation complications, no significant difference was found in radiation dermatitis of any grade between the 2 groups (p > 0.05). However, there was remarkable difference in clinical hypothyroidism and radiation esophagitis between Group A and Group B (p < 0.05).
conclusionsRadiotherapy after surgery omitting level Ⅳ may improve the quality of life in patients with locally advanced supraglottic and glottic laryngeal carcinoma, won't worsen the prognosis as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.