Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33517742›Full record

ArticleThe bone & joint journal2021

Influence of team composition on turnover and efficiency of total hip and knee arthroplasty.

Eli M Cahan, Henry C Cousins, Joshua T Steere, Nicole A Segovia, Matthew D Miller, Derek F Amanatullah

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The bone & joint journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eli M CahanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1565-3373
Henry C CousinsDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8694-0604
Joshua T SteereDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Nicole A SegoviaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9137-454X
Matthew D MillerDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Derek F AmanatullahDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Stanford Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6203-5853
Stanford Medicine · US

Funding

Institutional Career Development Core (KL2)KL2TR003143 · NCATS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ASCH, STEVEN M. · 2019 to 2023
$8.7M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR003143
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsSurgical costs are a major component of healthcare expenditures in the USA. Intraoperative communication is a key factor contributing to patient outcomes. However, the effectiveness of communication is only partially determined by the surgeon, and understanding how non-surgeon personnel affect intraoperative communication is critical for the development of safe and cost-effective staffing guidelines. Operative efficiency is also dependent on high-functioning teams and can offer a proxy for effective communication in highly standardized procedures like primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. We aimed to evaluate how the composition and dynamics of surgical teams impact operative efficiency during arthroplasty.

methodsWe performed a retrospective review of staff characteristics and operating times for 112 surgeries (70 primary total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and 42 primary total knee arthroplasties (TKAs)) conducted by a single surgeon over a one-year period. Each surgery was evaluated in terms of operative duration, presence of surgeon-preferred staff, and turnover of trainees, nurses, and other non-surgical personnel, controlling cases for body mass index, presence of osteoarthritis, and American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score.

resultsTurnover among specific types of operating room staff, including the anaesthesiologist (p = 0.011), circulating nurse (p = 0.027), and scrub nurse (p = 0.006), was significantly associated with increased operative duration. Furthermore, the presence of medical students and nursing students were associated with improved intraoperative efficiency in TKA (p = 0.048) and THA (p = 0.015), respectively. The presence of surgical fellows (p > 0.05), vendor representatives (p > 0.05), and physician assistants (p > 0.05) had no effect on intraoperative efficiency. Finally, the presence of the surgeon's 'preferred' staff did not significantly shorten operative duration, except in the case of residents (p = 0.043).

conclusionOur findings suggest that active management of surgical team turnover and composition may provide a means of improving intraoperative efficiency during THA and TKA. Cite this article:

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, HipArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeEfficiency, OrganizationalHumansInterprofessional RelationsOperative TimePatient Care TeamPersonnel TurnoverRetrospective StudiesHealthcare economicsIntraoperative communicationQuality improvementTotal hip arthroplastyTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID33517742
PMCPMC8811712
OpenAlexW3126430694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.