Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33517557›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2021

The IFSO Worldwide One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass Survey: Techniques and Outcomes?

Ashraf Haddad, Ahmad Bashir, Mathias Fobi, Kelvin Higa, Miguel F Herrera, Antonio J Torres, Jacques Himpens, Scott Shikora, Almino Cardoso Ramos, Lilian Kow and 1 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Comparative Study for Safety and Efficacy of OAGB and SADJB-SG: A Retrospective Study.Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy · 2024
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A Long-Term Comparative Study Between One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 7 countries.

Ashraf HaddadMinimally Invasive & Bariatric Surgery, Gastrointestinal Bariatric and Metabolic Center (GBMC) -Jordan Hospital, Queen Noor St., 4th Circle, P.O BOX 3073, Amman, 11181, Jordan. drajhaddad@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5300-5804
Ahmad BashirMinimally Invasive & Bariatric Surgery, Gastrointestinal Bariatric and Metabolic Center (GBMC) -Jordan Hospital, Queen Noor St., 4th Circle, P.O BOX 3073, Amman, 11181, Jordan.
Mathias FobiClinical Affairs and Research, Mohak Bariatric and Robotics, Indore, India.
Kelvin HigaAdvanced Laparoscopic Surgery Associates, University of California San Francisco-Fresno, Fresno Heart and Surgical Hospital, Fresno, CA, USA.
Miguel F HerreraEndocrine and Bariatric Surgery, UNAM at INCMNSZ, Mexico City, México.
Antonio J TorresGeneral and Bariatric Surgery, Complutense University of Madrid, Hospital Clinico "San Carlos", Madrid, Spain.
Jacques HimpensMetabolic-Bariatric Surgery, CHIREC Delta Hospital, Brussels, Belgium.
Scott ShikoraHarvard Medical School, Center for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Almino Cardoso RamosGastro-Obeso-Center Institute of Metabolic Optimization, Bela Vista, São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Lilian KowAdelaide Bariatric Centre, 12 The Parade, Norwood, SA, 5067, Australia.
Abdelrahman Ali NimeriAtrium Health Weight Management, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA.
Jordan Hospital · JOBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCarolinas Medical Center · USCentre Hospitalier Interrégional Edith Cavell · BEGastro Obeso Center · BRInstituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán · MXThe University of Adelaide · AUUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionOne anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) has become one of the most commonly performed gastric bypass procedures in some countries.

objectivesTo assess how surgeons viewed the OAGB, perceptions, indications, techniques, and outcomes, as well as the incidence of short- and long-term complications and how they were managed worldwide.

methodsA questionnaire was sent to all IFSO members in all 5 chapters to study the pattern of practice and outcomes of OAGB.

resultsSeven hundred and forty-two surgeons responded. The most commonly performed procedures were sleeve gastrectomy (SG), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), and OAGB. Preoperatively, 70% of the surgeons performed endoscopy routinely. In regards to weight loss, 83% (570 surgeons) responded that OAGB produces better weight loss than SG, and 49% (342 surgeons) responded that OAGB produces better weight loss than RYGB. The most common length of the biliopancreatic limb (BPL) utilized was 200 cm. Sixty-seven percent of surgeons did not measure the total length of the small bowel. In patients with reflux disease and history of smoking, 53% and 22% of surgeons respectively still offered OAGB as a treatment option. Postoperatively, leak was documented in 963 patients, and it was the leading cause for mortality. Leak management was conservative in 35%. Conversion to RYGB was performed in 31%. In 16% the anastomosis was reinforced, 6% of the patients were reversed, and other procedures were performed in 12%. Revision of OAGB for malnutrition/steatorrhea or severe bile reflux was reported at least once by 37% and 45% of surgeons, respectively (200 cm was the most commonly encountered biliopancreatic limb BPL in those revised for malnutrition). Most common strategy for revision was conversion to RYGB (43%), reversal to normal anatomy (32%), shortening of the BPL (20%), and conversion to SG (5%). Nevertheless, 5 out of 98 mortalities (5%) were due to liver failure/malnutrition.

conclusionThere are infrequent but potentially severe specific complications including malnutrition, liver failure, and bile reflux that may require surgical correction after OAGB.

Indexed as

Bile RefluxGastric BypassObesity, MorbidGastrectomyHumansWeight LossBile refluxBiliopancreatic limb lengthGastric bypassLiver failureMalnutritionMini gastric bypassOne anastomosis gastric bypassPostoperative complicationsPostoperative leakRevision of one anastomosis gastric bypass

Identifiers

PMID33517557
OpenAlexW3127461906

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.