Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33517547›Full record

Observational studyEmergency radiology2021

Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on CT scans ordered from the emergency department for abdominal complaints.

April M Griffith, Patrick Ockerse, Akram Shaaban, Christopher Kelly

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Emergency radiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Acute appendicitis-advances and controversies.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

April M GriffithDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah Health, 30 North 1900 East #1A071, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132-2140, USA. April.Griffith@hsc.utah.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8914-4590
Patrick OckerseDepartment of Surgery, Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Akram ShaabanDepartment of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, University of Utah Health, 30 North 1900 East #1A071, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132-2140, USA.
Christopher KellyDepartment of Surgery, Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe COVID-19 pandemic has affected healthcare systems and patients alike across the USA. We seek to elucidate changes in abdominal imaging ordered from the emergency department (ED) in a healthcare system undergoing non-surge conditions in April 2020 compared to April 2019.

methodsWe performed a retrospective, observational study comparing patients undergoing CT scans of the abdomen and pelvis ordered from the ED in April 2020 vs. April 2019 at a single healthcare center. Via review of the radiology report and electronic medical record, we determined the positive or negative status of these scans. We evaluated percentages of positive CT scans and differences in outcomes, including admission rates, interventions, and mortality.

resultsComparing 2020 to 2019, there was a 31.6% decrease in the number of CT scans performed from the ED. We found a higher percentage of positive CT findings, 58.2% vs. 50.8% (p = 0.025), and increased admission rates, 40.8% vs. 34.1% (p = 0.036). Differences were found in rates of appendicitis, colitis, and cholangitis. No difference was found in ICU admissions, interventions, or in-hospital mortality.

conclusionDuring the COVID-19 pandemic in a region undergoing non-surge conditions, we found increased rates of positive CT scans performed from the ED for abdominal complaints with an increased percentage of hospital admissions compared to a control year. No differences in ICU admissions or rates of procedural intervention were found to suggest higher acuity of pathology on presentation. Our findings suggest appropriately decreased healthcare utilization in our study period, driven by pre-hospital patient self-selection.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalAbdomen, AcuteAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCOVID-19FemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemicsRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2Tomography, X-Ray ComputedAbdominal painComputed tomographyCOVID-19Emergency departmentHealthcare utilization

Identifiers

PMID33517547
PMCPMC7847299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.