Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33517524›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2021

Development of screening questions for doctor-patient consultation assessing the quality of life and psychosocial burden of glioma patients: an explorative study.

Hannah Voß, Peter Scholz-Kreisel, Christoph Richter, Florian Ringel, Susanne Singer, Mirjam Renovanz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hannah VoßDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Peter Scholz-KreiselDivision of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Christoph RichterDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Florian RingelDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Susanne SingerDivision of Epidemiology and Health Services Research, Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University Medical Center, Johannes-Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
Mirjam RenovanzDepartment of Neurooncology, University Hospital, Tuebingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, 72076, Tuebingen, Germany. mirjam.renovanz@med.uni-tuebingen.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2824-3720

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePsychosocial screening for glioma patients is challenging because many patients suffer from neurocognitive deficits, which may impair assessment. This study's aim was to exploratively develop three screening questions for unmet needs to prospectively be applicable in patient-doctor consultation.

methodsPatient interviews, a survey for health-care professionals and a weighted scoring procedure were developed for this study. Six main areas were defined according to main areas of validated questionnaires (psyche, cognition, body, role functioning, social support, unmet needs). Patients and health-care professionals rated the importance of these areas and corresponding items, patients additionally stated whether the issues addressed affected them.

resultsA total of 50 patients were included, and 36 health-care professionals participated in the online survey. The three areas (psyche, body and cognition) considered to be most relevant by both, health-care professionals and patients, generated three screening questions. If the patient was affected by the issue addressed with a screening question, a subordinate question from that area that our patient sample considered most important could additionally be asked. The elaborated screening questions are the following: (1) main area psyche: "Has your mood worsened?", (2) main area body: "Do physical changes put a strain on you?", and (3) main area cognition: "Has your memory capacity worsened?"

conclusionThese questions represent a basis for further research regarding their application in neuro-oncological clinical routine.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBrain NeoplasmsFemaleGliomaHumansMaleMass ScreeningMiddle AgedPhysician-Patient RelationsPsychologyQuality of LifeSocial SupportSurveys and QuestionnairesBrain tumorDistressGliomaNeurooncologyQuality of lifeScreening

Identifiers

PMID33517524
PMCPMC8068662

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.