ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2021
Harmonisation of PET/CT contrast recovery performance for brain studies.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long vs. short axial field-of-view PET scanners for brain imaging: a phantom study.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2026Article
- Innovations in clinical PET image reconstruction: advances in Bayesian penalized likelihood algorithm and deep learning.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2025Review
- Quantification of baseline amyloid PET in individuals with subjective cognitive decline can identify risk of amyloid accumulation and cognitive worsening: the FACEHBI study.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- Data-Driven Image-Based Protocol for Brain PET Image Harmonization.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- IRMA: Machine learning-based harmonization ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025Article
- A novel method for harmonization of PET image spatial resolution without phantoms.EJNMMI physics · 2025Article
- Quantitative Accuracy Assessment of the NeuroEXPLORER for Diverse Imaging Applications: Moving Beyond Standard Evaluations.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025Article
- Relationship between physical parameters and visual analysis for assessment of image quality: a multi-center and multi-vendor phantom study in brain SPECT.Asia Oceania journal of nuclear medicine & biology · 2025Article
- Optimization of penalization function in Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm for [Physical and engineering sciences in medicine · 2024Article
- Recent Breakthroughs in PET-CT Multimodality Imaging: Innovations and Clinical Impact.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Impact of PET Reconstruction on Amyloid-β Quantitation in Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Analyses.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024Article
- Phantom and clinical evaluation of the Bayesian penalised likelihood reconstruction algorithm Q.Clear without PSF correction in amyloid PET images.EJNMMI physics · 2024Article
- Posterior cingulate cortex hyperactivity in conversion disorder: a PET/MRI study.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2024Article
- Characterisation of a novel [EJNMMI research · 2023Article
- Harmonization of brain PET images in multi-center PET studies using Hoffman phantom scan.EJNMMI physics · 2023Article
- Toward standardization of tau PET imaging corresponding to various tau PET tracers: a multicenter phantom study.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2023Article
- A review of harmonization strategies for quantitative PET.Annals of nuclear medicine · 2023Review
- Convolutional neural networks for automatic image quality control and EARL compliance of PET images.EJNMMI physics · 2022Article
- Advanced quantitative evaluation of PET systems using the ACR phantom and NiftyPET software.Medical physics · 2022Article
- The amyloid imaging for the prevention of Alzheimer's disease consortium: A European collaboration with global impact.Frontiers in neurology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeIn order to achieve comparability of image quality, harmonisation of PET system performance is imperative. In this study, prototype harmonisation criteria for PET brain studies were developed.
methodsTwelve clinical PET/CT systems (4 GE, 4 Philips, 4 Siemens, including SiPM-based "digital" systems) were used to acquire 30-min PET scans of a Hoffman 3D Brain phantom filled with ~ 33 kBq·mL
resultsSystematic differences were observed for reconstructions with and without point-spread-function modelling (PSF
conclusionsTo achieve inter-scanner comparability, we propose selecting reconstruction settings based on RC
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.