Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33517506›Full record

SynthesisInternational ophthalmology2021

Deep lateral orbital decompression for Graves orbitopathy: a systematic review.

Antonio Augusto V Cruz, Bruna S N Equiterio, Barbara S A Cunha, Fabiana Batista Caetano, Roque Lima Souza

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International ophthalmology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Balanced medial-lateral wall vs selective 3-wall orbital decompression for sight-threatening Graves's orbitopathy: a clinical retrospective cohort study from 2016 to 2022.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Antonio Augusto V CruzDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil. aavecruz.fmrp@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8972-5571
Bruna S N EquiterioDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Barbara S A CunhaDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Fabiana Batista CaetanoDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Roque Lima SouzaDepartment of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine of Ribeirão Preto, University of São Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo systematically review the literature on the deep lateral orbital decompression (DLD).

methodsThe authors searched the MEDLINE, Lilac, Scopus, and EMBASE databases for all articles in English, Spanish, and French that used as keywords the terms orbital decompression and lateral wall. Two articles in German were also included. Data retrieved included the number of patients and orbits operated, types of the approach employed, exophthalmometric and horizontal eye position changes, and complications. The 95% confidence intervals (CI) of the mean Hertel changes induced by the surgery were calculated from series with 15 or more data.

resultsOf the 204 publications initially retrieved, 131 were included. Detailed surgical techniques were analyzed from 59 articles representing 4559 procedures of 2705 patients. In 45.8% of the reports, the orbits were decompressed ab-interno. Ab-externo and rim-off techniques were used in 25.4% and 28.8% of the orbits, respectively. Mean and 95% CI intervals of Hertel changes, pooled from 15 articles, indicate that the effect of the surgery is not related to the technique and ranges from 2.5 to 4.5 mm. The rate of new onset of diplopia varied from zero to 8.6%. Several complications have been reported including dry eye, oscillopsia, temporal howling, lateral rectus damage, and bleeding. Unilateral amaurosis and subdural hematoma have been described in only one patients each.

conclusionsThe low rate of new-onset diplopia is the main benefit of DLD. Prospective studies are needed to compare the rate of complications induced by the 3 main surgical techniques used.

Indexed as

Graves OphthalmopathyDecompression, SurgicalHumansOrbitProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesDeep lateral decompressionGraves diseaseGraves orbitopathyOrbital decompressionOrbital surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.