Does Early Identification of Central Congenital Hypothyroidism Result in Improved Outcomes?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Bridging Gaps in Newborn Screening: A Comparative Study of Point-of-Care Testing Versus Traditional Reference Laboratory Method for Congenital Hypothyroidism.Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies · 2026
   Article
2. Data-Related and Methodological Challenges in Assessing the Cost-Effectiveness of Traditional and Genomic Newborn Screening Programs.Applied health economics and health policy · 2026
   Review
3. Estimates of congenital cytomegalovirus-attributable infant mortality in high-income countries: A review.Reviews in medical virology · 2024
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Cognitive and Motor Outcome in Patients with Early-Detected Central Congenital Hypothyroidism Compared with Siblings.2021

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as