Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33517382›Full record

SynthesisJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2021

A systematic review of contributing factors of and solutions to electronic health record-related impacts on physician well-being.

Oliver T Nguyen, Nyasia J Jenkins, Neel Khanna, Shivani Shah, Alexander J Gartland, Kea Turner, Lisa J Merlo

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Measuring Documentation Burden in Healthcare.Journal of general internal medicine · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Information system support for case-based knowledge formation in social welfare: a cross-sectional study.Health information management : journal of the Health Information Management Association of Australia · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Oliver T NguyenDepartment of Health Services Administration, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Nyasia J JenkinsDepartment of Patient Administration, Navy Medical Service Corps, U.S. Navy, Okinawa, Japan.
Neel KhannaDepartment of Health Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Shivani ShahCollege of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Alexander J GartlandCollege of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA.
Kea TurnerDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA.
Lisa J MerloDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePhysicians often describe the electronic health record (EHR) as a cumbersome impediment to meaningful work, which has important implications for physician well-being. This systematic review (1) assesses organizational, physician, and information technology factors associated with EHR-related impacts on physician well-being; and (2) highlights potential improvements to EHR form and function, as recommended by frontline physicians. MATERIALS AND

methodsThe MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ProQuest, and Web of Science databases were searched for literature describing EHR use by physicians and markers of well-being.

resultsAfter reviewing 7388 article, 35 ultimately met the inclusion criteria. Multiple factors across all levels were associated with EHR-related well-being among physicians. Notable predictors amenable to interventions include (1) total EHR time, (2) after-hours EHR time, (3) on-site EHR support, (4) perceived EHR usability, (5) in-basket burden, and (6) documentation burden. Physician recommendations also echoed these themes.

conclusionsThere are multiple complex factors involved in EHR-related well-being among physicians. Our review shows physicians have recommendations that span from federal regulations to organizational policies to EHR modifications. Future research should assess multipronged interventions that address these factors. As primary stakeholders, physicians should be included in the planning and implementation of such modifications to ensure compatibility with physician needs and clinical workflows.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsPhysiciansAttitude of Health PersonnelBurnout, ProfessionalComputer User TrainingHumansJob SatisfactionWorkloadelectronic health recordphysician burnoutsubjective well-being

Identifiers

PMID33517382
PMCPMC8068432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.