Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33517381›Full record

SynthesisFamily practice2021

Interventions on health care providers to improve seasonal influenza vaccination rates among patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the evidence since 2000.

George N Okoli, Viraj K Reddy, Otto L T Lam, Tiba Abdulwahid, Nicole Askin, Edward Thommes, Ayman Chit, Ahmed M Abou-Setta, Salaheddin M Mahmud

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Family practice, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

George N OkoliGeorge and Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation.
Viraj K ReddyGeorge and Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation.
Otto L T LamGeorge and Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation.
Tiba AbdulwahidGeorge and Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation.
Nicole AskinNeil John Maclean Health Sciences Library, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Edward ThommesSanofi Pasteur, Swiftwater, PA, USA.
Ayman ChitSanofi Pasteur, Swiftwater, PA, USA.
Ahmed M Abou-SettaGeorge and Fay Yee Centre for Healthcare Innovation.
Salaheddin M MahmudCommunity Health Sciences, Rady Faculty of Health Sciences.ORCID 0000-0002-6574-0574

Funding

Sanofi Pasteur
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeasonal influenza vaccination (SIV) rates remain suboptimal in many populations, even in those with universal SIV.

objectiveTo summarize the evidence on interventions on health care providers (physicians/nurses/pharmacists) to increase SIV rates.

methodsWe systematically searched/selected full-text English publications from January 2000 to July 2019 (PROSPERO-CRD42019147199). Our outcome was the difference in SIV rates between patients in intervention and non-intervention groups. We calculated pooled difference using an inverse variance, random-effects model.

resultsWe included 39 studies from 8370 retrieved citations. Compared with no intervention, team-based training/education of physicians significantly increased SIV rates in adult patients: 20.1% [7.5-32.7%; I2 = 0%; two randomized controlled trials (RCTs)] and 13.4% [8.6-18.1%; I2 = 0%; two non-randomized intervention studies (NRS)]. A smaller increase was observed in paediatric patients: 7% (0.1-14%; I2 = 0%; two NRS), and in adult patients with team-based training/education of physicians and nurses together: 0.9% (0.2-1.5%; I2 = 30.6%; four NRS). One-off provision of guidelines/information to physicians, and to both physicians and nurses, increased SIV rates in adult patients: 23.8% (15.7-31.8%; I2 = 45.8%; three NRS) and paediatric patients: 24% (8.1-39.9%; I2 = 0%; two NRS), respectively. Use of reminders (prompts) by physicians and nurses slightly increased SIV rates in paediatric patients: 2.3% (0.5-4.2%; I2 = 0%; two RCTs). A larger increase was observed in adult patients: 18.5% (14.8-22.1%; I2 = 0%; two NRS). Evidence from both RCTs and NRS showed significant increases in SIV rates with varied combinations of interventions.

conclusionsLimited evidence suggests various forms of physicians' and nurses' education and use of reminders may be effective for increasing SIV rates among patients.

Indexed as

Influenza, HumanAdultAttitude of Health PersonnelChildHealth PersonnelHumansSeasonsVaccinationHealth personnelhuman influenzainterventionmeta-analysissystematic reviewvaccination

Identifiers

PMID33517381
PMCPMC8317218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.