Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33517378›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2021

Damage to Broca's area does not contribute to long-term speech production outcome after stroke.

Andrea Gajardo-Vidal, Diego L Lorca-Puls, Ploras Team, Holly Warner, Bawan Pshdary, Jennifer T Crinion, Alexander P Leff, Thomas M H Hope, Sharon Geva, Mohamed L Seghier and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 61 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
61citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
8.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

61 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 151 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Language Recovery after Brain Injury: A Structural Network Control Theory Study.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Visualization of functional and effective connectivity underlying auditory descriptive naming.Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

1 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrea Gajardo-VidalWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Diego L Lorca-PulsWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Ploras TeamWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Holly WarnerWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Bawan PshdaryWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Jennifer T CrinionInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.
Alexander P LeffInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience, University College London, London, UK.
Thomas M H HopeWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Sharon GevaWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Mohamed L SeghierCognitive Neuroimaging Unit, Emirates College for Advanced Education, Abu Dhabi, UAE.
David W GreenDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, UK.
Howard BowmanCentre for Cognitive Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems and the School of Computing, University of Kent, Canterbury, UK.
Cathy J PriceWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GBUniversity College London · GBEmirates College for Advanced Education · AENational Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery · GBUniversidad del Desarrollo · CLUniversity of Kent · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/M023672/1Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 203147/Z/16/ZWellcome Trust 205103/Z/16/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Broca's area in the posterior half of the left inferior frontal gyrus has long been thought to be critical for speech production. The current view is that long-term speech production outcome in patients with Broca's area damage is best explained by the combination of damage to Broca's area and neighbouring regions including the underlying white matter, which was also damaged in Paul Broca's two historic cases. Here, we dissociate the effect of damage to Broca's area from the effect of damage to surrounding areas by studying long-term speech production outcome in 134 stroke survivors with relatively circumscribed left frontal lobe lesions that spared posterior speech production areas in lateral inferior parietal and superior temporal association cortices. Collectively, these patients had varying degrees of damage to one or more of nine atlas-based grey or white matter regions: Brodmann areas 44 and 45 (together known as Broca's area), ventral premotor cortex, primary motor cortex, insula, putamen, the anterior segment of the arcuate fasciculus, uncinate fasciculus and frontal aslant tract. Spoken picture description scores from the Comprehensive Aphasia Test were used as the outcome measure. Multiple regression analyses allowed us to tease apart the contribution of other variables influencing speech production abilities such as total lesion volume and time post-stroke. We found that, in our sample of patients with left frontal damage, long-term speech production impairments (lasting beyond 3 months post-stroke) were solely predicted by the degree of damage to white matter, directly above the insula, in the vicinity of the anterior part of the arcuate fasciculus, with no contribution from the degree of damage to Broca's area (as confirmed with Bayesian statistics). The effect of white matter damage cannot be explained by a disconnection of Broca's area, because speech production scores were worse after damage to the anterior arcuate fasciculus with relative sparing of Broca's area than after damage to Broca's area with relative sparing of the anterior arcuate fasciculus. Our findings provide evidence for three novel conclusions: (i) Broca's area damage does not contribute to long-term speech production outcome after left frontal lobe strokes; (ii) persistent speech production impairments after damage to the anterior arcuate fasciculus cannot be explained by a disconnection of Broca's area; and (iii) the prior association between persistent speech production impairments and Broca's area damage can be explained by co-occurring white matter damage, above the insula, in the vicinity of the anterior part of the arcuate fasciculus.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAphasia, BrocaBroca AreaFemaleFrontal LobeHumansMaleMiddle AgedStrokeaphasiaarcuate fasciculusBroca’s areaspeech productionstroke

Identifiers

PMID33517378
PMCPMC8041045
OpenAlexW3128748244

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.