Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33516480›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2021

Effects of novel probiotic strains of Bacillus pumilus and Bacillus subtilis on production, gut health, and immunity of broiler chickens raised under suboptimal conditions.

Muhammad Bilal, Wei Si, Florence Barbe, Eric Chevaux, Olimpia Sienkiewicz, Xin Zhao

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. MitigatingMicroorganisms · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Antimicrobial and Nutritional Potentials ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  17. Single or Combined Supplementation ofVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Animal nutrition (Zhongguo xu mu shou yi xue hui) · 2025
    Article
  20. Effects of dietary supplementation withFrontiers in nutrition · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Muhammad BilalDepartment of Animal Science, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada.
Wei SiDepartment of Animal Science, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada.
Florence BarbeResearch and Development Department, Lallemand Animal Nutrition, Blagnac, France.
Eric ChevauxResearch and Development Department, Lallemand Animal Nutrition, Blagnac, France.
Olimpia SienkiewiczDepartment of Animal Science, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada.
Xin ZhaoDepartment of Animal Science, McGill University, Sainte-Anne-de-Bellevue, Quebec, Canada. Electronic address: xin.zhao@mcgill.ca.
McGill University · CALallemand (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Probiotics are being developed as alternatives to antibiotic growth promoters. The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of 2 novel strains of Bacillus pumilus and Bacillus subtilis on production, intestinal microbiota, gut health, and immunity of broilers raised under suboptimal conditions. Day-old chicks (Cobb 500, n = 2,073) were randomly assigned into 6 groups: Con group (group fed with basal diet), Ab group (group treated with virginiamycin), groups treated with 2 levels of B. pumilus (low dose: 3 × 10

Indexed as

Bacillus pumilusBacillus subtilisChickensGastrointestinal MicrobiomeProbioticsAnimalsDietGastrointestinal TractRandom AllocationBacillus probioticbroilergut healthimmunityproduction

Identifiers

PMID33516480
PMCPMC7936155
OpenAlexW3110103889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.