Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33516471›Full record

ArticlePoultry science2021

In ovo injection of black cumin (Nigella sativa) extract on hatching and post hatch performance of thermally challenged broiler chickens during incubation.

O E Oke, O B Oyelola, O S Iyasere, C P Njoku, A O Oso, O M Oso, S T Fatoki, K O Bankole, I O Jimoh, N I Sybill and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Poultry science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Exploring the modulatory effects of spotted pumpkin (Translational animal science · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Climate change and broiler production.Veterinary medicine and science · 2024
    Review
  10. Veterinary and animal science · 2023
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Potential Implication ofTranslational animal science · 2023
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Evaluation ofFrontiers in physiology · 2022
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

O E OkeCentre of Excellence in Avian Science, University of Lome, Lome, Togo; Department of Animal Physiology, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria. Electronic address: emaoke7@yahoo.co.uk.
O B OyelolaDepartment of Animal Physiology, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
O S IyasereDepartment of Animal Physiology, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
C P NjokuDepartment of Animal Production and Health, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
A O OsoDepartment of Animal Nutrition, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
O M OsoCentre of Excellence in Avian Science, University of Lome, Lome, Togo.
S T FatokiDepartment of Animal Physiology, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
K O BankoleDepartment of Animal Physiology, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
I O JimohDepartment of Animal Physiology, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
N I SybillDepartment of Animal Physiology, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
H O AwodipeDepartment of Animal Physiology, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
H O AdegbiteDepartment of Animal Physiology, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
S A RahmanDepartment of Veterinary Physiology and Pharmacology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
J O DaramolaDepartment of Animal Physiology, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate the effects in ovo injection of black cumin (BC) extract on chick's quality and response of thermally challenged broiler chickens. A total of 700 hatching eggs of broiler chickens (Marshall) were assigned to 7 treatments of 100 eggs each and incubated using the conventional protocol (37.8°C) for the first 10 d and then exposed to a high temperature (39.6°C) for 6 h daily from day 10 until day 18 of the incubation. At embryonic day 17.5, the eggs were randomly allotted to 7 treatment groups, viz.: eggs without in ovo injection (WA), eggs injected with 0.9% saline solution (SA), 3 mg ascorbic acid (AA), 2 mg BC (TB), 4 mg BC (FB), 6 mg BC (SB), and 8 mg BC (EB) extracts. Experiment was laid out in a Completely Randomized Design. After hatching, the chicks were reared separately according to in ovo treatments for 8 wk. Data were collected on hatchability, chick quality, internal organs, growth performance, plasma superoxide dismutase, malondialdehyde, and triiodothyronine (T

Indexed as

Body WeightChickensHeat-Shock ResponseNigella sativaOvumPlant ExtractsAnimalsAscorbic AcidHot TemperatureOrgan SizeRandom AllocationAscorbic AcidPlant Extractsantioxidantbroilerincubationin ovo injectionphysiology

Identifiers

PMID33516471
PMCPMC7936144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.