Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33516436›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2021

Qualitative Study of Interprofessional Collaboration in Radiation Oncology Clinics: Is There a Need for Further Education?

Olivia A Schultz, Robert S Hight, Stanley Gutiontov, Ravi Chandra, Jeanne Farnan, Daniel W Golden

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pilot Study Demonstrating the Value of Interdisciplinary Education on the Integration of Radiation Therapy in Lung Cancer Management.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Olivia A SchultzPritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Robert S HightPritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Stanley GutiontovDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Ravi ChandraDepartment of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
Jeanne FarnanDepartment of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Daniel W GoldenDepartment of Radiation and Cellular Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address: dgolden@radonc.uchicago.edu.
University of Chicago · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

Scholars in Oncology Associated Research (SOAR)R25CA240134 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI OLUFUNMILAYO F. OLOPADE · 2019 to 2026
$1.3M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA240134
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeInterprofessional education (IPE) is gaining recognition as a means of improving health care delivery and patient outcomes. A primary goal of IPE is improved interprofessional collaboration (IPC). The multidisciplinary team in the radiation oncology clinic requires effective IPC for optimal delivery of radiation therapy. However, there are limited data on IPE and IPC in radiation oncology. This qualitative study aims to characterize IPC in radiation oncology. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Semistructured phone interviews were performed from June to August 2019 with radiation oncologists, nurses, dosimetrists, radiation therapists, medical physicists, and medical students across a single academic medical center and affiliated network sites. Interviews were recorded, de-identified, and transcribed verbatim. Resulting transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis.

resultsSeventeen interviews were performed with 4 radiation oncologists, 2 nurses, 2 dosimetrists, 4 radiation therapists, 2 medical physicists, and 3 medical students. Thematic analysis identified 4 themes: (1) management of the radiation oncology clinic, (2) potential impact of interprofessional training in radiation oncology, (3) current climate of interprofessional education in radiation oncology, and (4) creating an interprofessional training program in radiation oncology. Each theme elicited between 2 and 7 subthemes.

conclusionsFrom the analytical themes that emerged, it is hypothesized that misunderstanding professionals' roles can lead to communication breakdown, which creates less efficient clinic management and disorganized patient care. Although other medical professionals shadow physicians during their training, physicians are not learning about other professions in the same way. Interviewees from each professional category recommend a formal shadowing program for radiation oncology trainees at the medical student or resident level. Having structured opportunities for IPE is important given competing demands of learners during medical student rotations and residency. This study suggests an unmet need for exposure of radiation oncology medical trainees to IPE with the ultimate goal of improving IPC in the radiation oncology clinic.

Indexed as

Interdisciplinary CommunicationInterprofessional RelationsAcademies and InstitutesCommunicationCooperative BehaviorCurriculumDelivery of Health CareFemaleHumansInternship and ResidencyMalePatient Care TeamProfessional RoleProgram DevelopmentQualitative ResearchRadiation Oncology

Identifiers

PMID33516436
PMCPMC7863582
OpenAlexW3128226852

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.