ArticleThe Lancet. Global health2021
SARS-CoV-2 testing for public health use: core principles and considerations for defined use settings.
Article in The Lancet. Global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accuracy and ease-of-use of seven point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detecting tests: A multi-centre clinical evaluation.EBioMedicine · 2022Trial
- Epidemiological, serological, and genetic evidence of influenza D virus infection in humans: Is it a justifiable cause for concern?Virulence · 2023Article
- Proportion of Respiratory Syncytial Virus, SARS-CoV-2, Influenza A/B, and Adenovirus Cases via Rapid Tests in the Community during Winter 2023-A Cross Sectional Study.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A comparative study of eight COVID-19 protective measures and their impact on Swiss tourists' travel intentions.Tourism management · 2023Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen self-tests in asymptomatic individuals in the omicron period: a cross-sectional study.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2023Article
- COVID-19 rapid antigen testing strategies must be evaluated in intended use settings.The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific · 2022Article
- SARS-CoV-2 Infection and Vaccination Coverage among Fragile Populations in a Local Health Area of Northern Italy.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Evaluation of the Panbio COVID-19 Antigen Rapid Diagnostic Test in Subjects Infected with Omicron Using Different Specimens.Microbiology spectrum · 2022Article
- Stroke Treatment in the Era of COVID-19: a Review.Current treatment options in neurology · 2022Review
- Modeling the optimization of COVID-19 pooled testing: How many samples can be included in a single test?Informatics in medicine unlocked · 2022Article
- The potential of SARS-CoV-2 antigen-detection tests in the screening of asymptomatic persons.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2021Article
- SARS-CoV-2 rapid antigen detection tests.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2021Article
- Diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen tests in asymptomatic and presymptomatic close contacts of individuals with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection: cross sectional study.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2021Article
- Validation of a rapid antigen test as a screening tool for SARS-CoV-2 infection in asymptomatic populations. Sensitivity, specificity and predictive values.EClinicalMedicine · 2021Article
- Managing the risks of making the wrong diagnosis: First, do no harm.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021Article
- Time variation in the probability of failing to detect a case of polymerase chain reaction testing for SARS-CoV-2 as estimated from a viral dynamics model.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2021Article
- Validation and deployment of a direct saliva real-time RT-PCR test on pooled samples for COVID-19 surveillance testing.PloS one · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.