Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33516201›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2021

Perspectives on voluntary assisted partner notification among providers, people with HIV and the general population in Indonesia: a formative qualitative study.

Gede Benny Setia Wirawan, Pande Putu Januraga, I Gusti Agung Agus Mahendra, Ngakan Putu Anom Harjana, Tiara Mahatmi, Lanny Luhukay, Bharat Bhushan Rewari, Cheryl Johnson, David A Katz

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Gede Benny Setia WirawanCenter for Public Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Bali, Denpasar, Indonesia.
Pande Putu JanuragaCenter for Public Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Bali, Denpasar, Indonesia. januraga@unud.ac.id.ORCID 0000-0002-2926-0856
I Gusti Agung Agus MahendraCenter for Public Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Bali, Denpasar, Indonesia.
Ngakan Putu Anom HarjanaCenter for Public Health Innovation, Faculty of Medicine, Udayana University, Bali, Denpasar, Indonesia.
Tiara MahatmiWorld Health Organization Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Lanny LuhukayIndonesian Ministry of Health, Jakarta, Indonesia.
Bharat Bhushan RewariSouth-east Asia Regional Office, World Health Organization, New Delhi, India.
Cheryl JohnsonGlobal HIV, Hepatitis and STI Programme, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
David A KatzDepartment of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, USA.
Udayana University · IDMinistry of Health · IDUniversity of Washington · USWorld Health Organization · CHWorld Health Organization Regional Office for South-East Asia · INWWF-Indonesia · ID

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI EDWIN ROBERTO ORELLANA · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757World Health Organization 001World Health Organization 2020/1002269-1.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVoluntary assisted partner notification (aPN) services are effective in increasing access to and uptake of HIV testing among partners of people with HIV. Following recommendations by the World Health Organization in 2016, Indonesia evaluated various approaches to aPN. We present the lessons learned from formative operational research undertaken to understand provider and patient perspectives on aPN from three demonstration sites in cities with a high HIV burden.

methodsWe conducted a formative qualitative study in three cities: Jakarta, Semarang, and Denpasar between September and October 2019. We conducted six focus group discussions (FGDs) (n = 44 participants) among health-care providers, people living with HIV and the general population. We explored participant preferences and concerns about how aPN should be delivered, including the methods of and messaging for contacting partners. All FGDs were conducted in the Indonesian language. Qualitative data were analysed using thematic analysis.

resultsaPN was acceptable across different participant populations, although with caveats. Some differences were observed between the general population, providers and people living with HIV. People living with HIV were mainly concerned with confidentiality of the procedure and preferred the use of telecommunication and messages that avoid explicit mention of HIV exposure. Providers preferred similar approaches but for different reasons, being concerned mainly with self-efficacy and security. There was consensus regarding dual referral models. The use of phone calls and short messages were preferred as these are perceived to minimize negative reactions and stigma, protect client confidentiality and are suitable in the current legal situation. The general population was mainly concerned with effectiveness and prefer direct provider-led approaches, such as preferring in-person meeting with explicit notification of potential HIV exposure.

conclusionsWe found consensus among stakeholders on acceptance of aPN, especially dual referral methods. Development and implementation of aPN protocols should also consider clients' individual situations and concerns regarding safeguarding of confidentiality, and offer a range of options to accommodate all stakeholders involved.

Indexed as

Contact TracingHIV InfectionsHumansIndonesiaQualitative ResearchSexual PartnersAssisted partner notificationHIV/AIDSHIV partner servicesIndex testingIndonesiaProvider-assisted referral

Identifiers

PMID33516201
PMCPMC7847236
OpenAlexW3126419277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.