ArticleJournal of hazardous materials2021
High air flow-rate electrostatic sampler for the rapid monitoring of airborne coronavirus and influenza viruses.
Article in Journal of hazardous materials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Microfluidic Chip-Based Integrated Device Combining Aerosol Sampling and LAMP-CRISPR Detection for Airborne Virus Surveillance.Biosensors · 2025Article
- Mass and stiffness sensing performance of nanomechanical resonators: viability of infectious virus detection.Discover nano · 2025Article
- Review
- Real-world evaluation of a QCM-based biosensor for exhaled air.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Development of a Novel Electrostatic-Based Bioaerosol Sampler.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Research advances in microfluidic collection and detection of virus, bacterial, and fungal bioaerosols.Mikrochimica acta · 2024Review
- The BioCascade-VIVAS system for collection and delivery of virus-laden size-fractionated airborne particles.Journal of aerosol science · 2024Article
- On-site airborne pathogen detection for infection risk mitigation.Chemical Society reviews · 2023Review
- Emerging Infectious Diseases Are Virulent Viruses-Are We Prepared? An Overview.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Mechanisms, Techniques and Devices of Airborne Virus Detection: A Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Review
- Novel Virus Air Sampler Based on Electrostatic Precipitation and Air Sampling of SARS-CoV-2.Microorganisms · 2023Article
- Research progress of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 on aerosol collection and detection.Chinese chemical letters = Zhongguo hua xue kuai bao · 2023Review
- On-site bioaerosol sampling and detection in microfluidic platforms.Trends in analytical chemistry : TRAC · 2023Review
- An experimental method for efficiently evaluating the size-resolved sampling efficiency of liquid-absorption aerosol samplers.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Recent advancements in the measurement of pathogenic airborne viruses.Journal of hazardous materials · 2021Review
- Reusable surface amplified nanobiosensor for the sub PFU/mL level detection of airborne virus.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Challenges and Perspectives for Biosensing of Bioaerosol Containing Pathogenic Microorganisms.Micromachines · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Capturing virus aerosols in a small volume of liquid is essential when monitoring airborne viruses. As such, aerosol-to-hydrosol enrichment is required to produce a detectable viral sample for real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assays. To meet this requirement, the efficient and non-destructive collection of airborne virus particles is needed, while the incoming air flow rate should be sufficiently high to quickly collect a large number of virus particles. To achieve this, we introduced a high air flow-rate electrostatic sampler (HAFES) that collected virus aerosols (human coronavirus 229E, influenza A virus subtypes H1N1 and H3N2, and bacteriophage MS2) in a continuously flowing liquid. Viral collection efficiency was evaluated using aerosol particle counts, while viral recovery rates were assessed using real-time qRT-PCR and plaque assays. An air sampling period of 20 min was sufficient to produce a sample suitable for use in real-time qRT-PCR in a viral epidemic scenario.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.