Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33516066›Full record

ArticleBrain and language2021

Automaticity in the reading circuitry.

Sung Jun Joo, Kambiz Tavabi, Sendy Caffarra, Jason D Yeatman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and language, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Reading reshapes stimulus selectivity in the visual word form area.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Functional and morphological correlates of developmental dyslexia: A multimodal investigation of the ventral occipitotemporal cortex.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging · 2021
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sung Jun JooDepartment of Psychology, Pusan National University, Busan, Republic of Korea; Institute for Learning & Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Graduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: sungjun@pusan.ac.kr.
Kambiz TavabiInstitute for Learning & Brain Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
Sendy CaffarraGraduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Division of Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language, San Sebastian 20009, Spain.
Jason D YeatmanGraduate School of Education, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Division of Developmental-Behavioral Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.

Funding

Neural mechanisms of successful intervention in children with dyslexiaR01HD095861 · NICHD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI YEATMAN, JASON D · 2019 to 2024
$3.1M
Biological origins of literacyR21HD092771 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI KUHL, PATRICIA K, YEATMAN, JASON D · 2018 to 2019
$435k
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD095861NICHD NIH HHS R21 HD092771
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skilled reading requires years of practice associating visual symbols with speech sounds. Over the course of the learning process, this association becomes effortless and automatic. Here we test whether automatic activation of spoken-language circuits in response to visual words is a hallmark of skilled reading. Magnetoencephalography was used to measure word-selective responses under multiple cognitive tasks (N = 42, 7-12 years of age). Even when attention was drawn away from the words by performing an attention-demanding fixation task, strong word-selective responses were found in a language region (i.e., superior temporal gyrus) starting at ~300 ms after stimulus onset. Critically, this automatic word-selective response was indicative of reading skill: the magnitude of word-selective responses correlated with individual reading skill. Our results suggest that automatic recruitment of spoken-language circuits is a hallmark of skilled reading; with practice, reading becomes effortless as the brain learns to automatically translate letters into sounds and meaning.

Indexed as

PhoneticsReadingBrainHumansLanguageMagnetoencephalographyAutomaticityDyslexiaMEGReading

Identifiers

PMID33516066
PMCPMC7878427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.