Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33516049›Full record

ArticleJournal of chromatography. A2021

A comparison of 2 micron inner diameter open tubular column liquid chromatography with pressure-driven isocratic, slip-flow, and electrochromatographic modes of operation: a theoretical study.

Mark R Schure, Matthew D Beauchamp

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chromatography. A, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mark R SchureTheoretical Separation Science Laboratory Kroungold Analytical Inc., 1299 Butler Pike, Blue Bell, PA 19422 USA. Electronic address: mark.schure@gmail.com.
Matthew D BeauchampDepartment of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716 USA; Merck & Company, Inc. Mail Stop WP1-3, 770 Sumneytown Pike, West Point, PA 19486 USA.
University of Delaware · US

Funding

Portable Multiplexed LATE-PCR Influenza TestU01AI077829 · NIAID · SMITHS DETECTION, INC. · PI WILLIAMS, GREG V · 2009 to 2010
$2.2M
Large Pore SPP Particles for Protein SeparationsR44GM116224 · NIGMS · ADVANCED MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY, INC. · PI BOYES, BARRY E · 2018 to 2019
$1.9M
Non-Spherical Particles for HPLCR44GM108122 · NIGMS · ADVANCED MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY, INC. · PI BOYES, BARRY E · 2015 to 2017
$1.3M
Novel Materials and Methods for Separations of Glycopeptides and GlycansR44GM093747 · NIGMS · ADVANCED MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY, INC. · PI BOYES, BARRY E · 2013 to 2015
$1.2M
High Resolution Superficially Porous Materials for Native Protein SeparationsR43GM140789 · NIGMS · ADVANCED MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY, INC. · PI BOYES, BARRY E · 2021 to 2021
$280k
Assembled Porous Silica Membranes for Biomolecule SPER43GM122098 · NIGMS · ADVANCED MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY, INC. · PI BOYES, BARRY E · 2017 to 2017
$231k
Improved Protein Separations with Superficially Porous ParticlesR43GM116224 · NIGMS · ADVANCED MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY, INC. · PI BOYES, BARRY E · 2015 to 2015
$219k
Smaller Particle Fused-Core Silicas for Higher Performance SeparationsR43GM099355 · NIGMS · ADVANCED MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY, INC. · PI BOYES, BARRY E · 2011 to 2011
$204k
Novel Materials and Methods for Separations of Glycopeptides and GlycansR43GM093747 · NIGMS · ADVANCED MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY, INC. · PI BOYES, BARRY E · 2011 to 2011
$200k
Ellipsoid Particles for High Performance LC SeparationsR43GM108122 · NIGMS · ADVANCED MATERIALS TECHNOLOGY, INC. · PI BOYES, BARRY E · 2013 to 2013
$191k
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI077829NIGMS NIH HHS R43 GM093747NIGMS NIH HHS R43 GM099355NIGMS NIH HHS R43 GM108122NIGMS NIH HHS R43 GM116224NIGMS NIH HHS R43 GM122098NIGMS NIH HHS R43 GM140789NIGMS NIH HHS R44 GM093747NIGMS NIH HHS R44 GM108122NIGMS NIH HHS R44 GM116224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Modifications to the flow profile used in open tube capillary liquid chromatography (OT-CLC) include using slip-flow walls and using electroosmosis as a fluid pump as practiced in electrochromatography. These modifications are implemented experimentally by changing the capillary surface and solvent conditions which results in the change of boundary conditions at the capillary wall. In this paper we employ a theory-based study and compare the zone broadening of simple solutes using parabolic flow from a liquid pump, slip-flow from a highly hydrophobic inner surface with water eluent, and electroosmosis for the conditions of pure water and dilute salt utilizing 2 µm inner diameter OT capillaries. In general, the two types of flow other than parabolic exhibit thin zones in the early part of the chromatogram, consistent with previous studies of slip-flow and electroosmotic flow used in electrochromatography. Electrochromatography is shown to yield higher efficiency and less zone broadening than parabolic and slip-flow conditions used in this study. Nonetheless, it is found that the zone standard deviations are shown to be similar for these flow profiles as is the number of plates for these different flow profiles under the conditions utilized here. It is revealed that these modifications do not warrant the effort to maintain the special solvent conditions when compared to gradient elution OT-CLC, which gives a nearly constant peak width throughout the chromatogram, is easiest to implement, and is the method of choice for complex analysis.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalPressureRheologyCapillary ElectrochromatographyChromatography, LiquidElectroosmosisSolutionsSolutionsCapillary columnDispersion theoryElectrochromatographyLiquid chromatographyOpen tubular (OT) columnSlip-flow

Identifiers

PMID33516049
PMCPMC7870565
OpenAlexW3113444363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.