Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33515932›Full record

ArticleEpilepsy & behavior : E&B2021

Community perceptions and attitudes regarding epilepsy and disease cost after implementation of a community-based epilepsy treatment program in onchocerciasis-endemic communities in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

Alfred Dusabimana, Michel Ndahura Mandro, Joseph Nelson Siewe Fodjo, Husseini Dolo, Samuel Coenen, Robert Colebunders

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epilepsy & behavior : E&B, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Alfred DusabimanaGlobal Health Institute (GHI), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Doornstraat 331, B-2610 Wilrijk, Belgium. Electronic address: alfred.dusabimana@uantwerpen.be.
Michel Ndahura MandroProvincial Health Division Ituri, Ministry of Health, Bunia, Democratic Republic of Congo. Electronic address: Michel.MandroNdahura@student.uantwerpen.be.
Joseph Nelson Siewe FodjoGlobal Health Institute (GHI), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Doornstraat 331, B-2610 Wilrijk, Belgium. Electronic address: josephnelson.siewefodjo@uantwerpen.be.
Husseini DoloFilariasis Unit, International Center of Excellence in Research, Faculty of Medicine and Odontostomatology, Point G, Bamako, Mali. Electronic address: hdolo@icermali.org.
Samuel CoenenDepartment of Family Medicine & Population Health (FAMPOP), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken, Doornstraat 331, 2610 Antwerp (Wilrijk), Belgium; Vaccine & Infectious Disease Institute (VAXINFECTIO), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Campus Drie Eiken, Universiteitsplein 1, 2610 Antwerp (Wilrijk), Belgium. Electronic address: Samuel.coenen@uantwerpen.be.
Robert ColebundersGlobal Health Institute (GHI), Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Doornstraat 331, B-2610 Wilrijk, Belgium. Electronic address: robert.colebunders@uantwerpen.be.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn October 2017, a community-based epilepsy treatment program (CBETP) was initiated in the Logo health zone (Ituri province, Democratic Republic of Congo), consisting mainly of community epilepsy education, provision of free antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), and monthly follow-up of persons with epilepsy (PWE). Prior to the implementation of the CBETP, qualitative research had revealed several misconceptions about the cause of epilepsy, major epilepsy-related stigma, and high economic cost for families of PWE mainly because of costly treatment by traditional healers. One year after the implementation of the CBETP, we assessed the perceived effect of this program on the community's perceptions and attitudes regarding epilepsy and on disease costs.

methodsFocus group discussions (FGD) and semi-structured in-depth interviews (SSI) were conducted with different target groups. Additionally, the cost associated with epilepsy was evaluated using questionnaires administered to 74 PWE and/or their families.

resultsNine FGDs and 16 SSIs were conducted. There was a notable shift in perceptions and attitudes, as most community members no longer believed that epilepsy is contagious, while acknowledging that this condition can be treated in local health centers. Persons with epilepsy and their family experienced less epilepsy-related stigma and consulted less frequently traditional healers; the latter showed a growing willingness to collaborate with health professionals in the management of PWE. The direct and indirect costs for families caring for a PWE decreased by 95.2% and 95.7%, respectively.

conclusionThe main perceived benefits of the CBETP were the decrease in misconceptions about epilepsy and epilepsy-related stigma. Families with PWE understood the benefit of seeking health care from trained health professionals rather than with traditional healers. The direct and indirect costs for families to take care of a PWE reduced considerably after the program. However, the cost-effectiveness and long-term sustainability of this approach remain to be assessed.

Indexed as

EpilepsyOnchocerciasisAttitudeCost of IllnessDemocratic Republic of the CongoHumansPerceptionAntiepilepticCommunity-basedEpilepsyMisconceptionsStigmaSustainability

Identifiers

PMID33515932
PMCPMC7960634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.