Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33515750›Full record

ArticleGenomics, proteomics & bioinformatics2020

GTB-PPI: Predict Protein-protein Interactions Based on L1-regularized Logistic Regression and Gradient Tree Boosting.

Bin Yu, Cheng Chen, Hongyan Zhou, Bingqiang Liu, Qin Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Research on the Computational Prediction of Essential Genes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bin YuSchool of Life Sciences, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230027, China; College of Mathematics and Physics, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266061, China; Artificial Intelligence and Biomedical Big Data Research Center, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266061, China. Electronic address: yubin@qust.edu.cn.
Cheng ChenCollege of Mathematics and Physics, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266061, China; Artificial Intelligence and Biomedical Big Data Research Center, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266061, China.
Hongyan ZhouCollege of Mathematics and Physics, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266061, China; Artificial Intelligence and Biomedical Big Data Research Center, Qingdao University of Science and Technology, Qingdao 266061, China.
Bingqiang LiuSchool of Mathematics, Shandong University, Jinan 250100, China.
Qin MaDepartment of Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA. Electronic address: qin.ma@osumc.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are of great importance to understand genetic mechanisms, delineate disease pathogenesis, and guide drug design. With the increase of PPI data and development of machine learning technologies, prediction and identification of PPIs have become a research hotspot in proteomics. In this study, we propose a new prediction pipeline for PPIs based on gradient tree boosting (GTB). First, the initial feature vector is extracted by fusing pseudo amino acid composition (PseAAC), pseudo position-specific scoring matrix (PsePSSM), reduced sequence and index-vectors (RSIV), and autocorrelation descriptor (AD). Second, to remove redundancy and noise, we employ L1-regularized logistic regression (L1-RLR) to select an optimal feature subset. Finally, GTB-PPI model is constructed. Five-fold cross-validation showed that GTB-PPI achieved the accuracies of 95.15% and 90.47% on Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Helicobacter pylori datasets, respectively. In addition, GTB-PPI could be applied to predict the independent test datasets for Caenorhabditis elegans, Escherichia coli, Homo sapiens, and Mus musculus, the one-core PPI network for CD9, and the crossover PPI network for the Wnt-related signaling pathways. The results show that GTB-PPI can significantly improve accuracy of PPI prediction. The code and datasets of GTB-PPI can be downloaded from https://github.com/QUST-AIBBDRC/GTB-PPI/.

Indexed as

Computational BiologySaccharomyces cerevisiaeAnimalsHumansLogistic ModelsMachine LearningMicePosition-Specific Scoring MatricesProtein Interaction MappingFeature fusionGradient tree boostingL1-regularized logistic regressionMachine learningProtein–protein interaction

Identifiers

PMID33515750
PMCPMC8377384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.