Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33515724›Full record

ReviewGene2021

RBM10: Structure, functions, and associated diseases.

Akira Inoue

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Gene, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. LncRNAJournal of virology · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The therapeutic potential of RNA m(6)A in lung cancer.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Investigation ofHeliyon · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akira InoueDepartment of Otolaryngology, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, 1-4-3 Asahimachi, Abeno-ku, Osaka 545-8585, Japan. Electronic address: ainoue@med.osaka-cu.ac.jp.
Osaka City University · JP

Funding

The Gene Wiki: Community intelligence applied to gene annotationR01GM089820 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI SU, ANDREW I · 2010 to 2021
$5.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM089820
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RBM10 is a nuclear RNA-binding protein (RBP) that regulates the alternative splicing of primary transcripts. Recently, research on RBM10 has become increasingly active owing to its clinical importance, as indicated by studies on RBM0 mutations that cause TARP syndrome, an X-linked congenital pleiotropic developmental anomaly, and various cancers such as lung adenocarcinoma in adults. Herein, the molecular biology of RBM10 and its significance in medicine are reviewed, focusing on the gene and protein structures of RBM10, its cell biology, molecular functions and regulation, relationship with the paralogous protein RBM5, and the mutations of RBM10 and their associated diseases. Finally, the challenges in future studies of RBM10 are discussed in the concluding remarks.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseAnimalsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsGene Expression RegulationHumansMutationNeoplasmsRNA-Binding ProteinsRNA SplicingTumor Suppressor ProteinsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsRBM10 protein, humanRBM5 protein, humanRBM6 protein, humanRNA-Binding ProteinsTumor Suppressor ProteinsAlternative splicingAntithetical effects of RBM10RBM10 mutations and diseasesRBM5Regulation of RBM10Splicing networkX-inactivation

Identifiers

PMID33515724
PMCPMC10445532
OpenAlexW3123295569

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.