Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33515586›Full record

ReviewPharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior2021

Use and abuse of dissociative and psychedelic drugs in adolescence.

M L Shawn Bates, Keith A Trujillo

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Toward a framework for psychedelic clinical trials in adolescents.Child and adolescent psychiatry and mental health · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Cortical Mechanisms Contributing to Ketamine-Induced Dissociation.The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M L Shawn BatesDepartment of Psychology, California State University Chico, 400 W. First St, Chico, CA 95929, USA. Electronic address: mlbates@csuchico.edu.
Keith A TrujilloDepartment of Psychology and Office for Training, Research and Education in the Sciences (OTRES), California State University San Marcos, 333 S. Twin Oaks Valley Rd, San Marcos, CA 92096, USA.. Electronic address: keith@csusm.edu.
California State University, Chico · US

Funding

MBRS RISE Program at California State Univ, San MarcosR25GM064783 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS · PI TRUJILLO, KEITH A · 2002 to 2019
$9.6M
Behavioral Effects of Dissociatives in Adolescents: Comparison with AdultsSC3GM081069 · NIGMS · CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY SAN MARCOS · PI TRUJILLO, KEITH A · 2008 to 2011
$443k
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM064783NIGMS NIH HHS SC3 GM081069
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Adolescence is a period of profound developmental changes, which run the gamut from behavioral and neural to physiological and hormonal. It is also a time at which there is an increased propensity to engage in risk-taking and impulsive behaviors like drug use. This review examines the human and preclinical literature on adolescent drug use and its consequences, with a focus on dissociatives (PCP, ketamine, DXM), classic psychedelics (LSD, psilocybin), and MDMA. It is the case for all the substances reviewed here that very little is known about their effects in adolescent populations. An emerging aspect of the literature is that dissociatives and MDMA produce mixed reinforcing and aversive effects and that the balance between reinforcement and aversion may differ between adolescents and adults, with consequences for drug use and addiction. However, many studies have failed to directly compare adults and adolescents, which precludes definitive conclusions about these consequences. Other important areas that are largely unexplored are sex differences during adolescence and the long-term consequences of adolescent use of these substances. We provide suggestions for future work to address the gaps we identified in the literature. Given the widespread use of these drugs among adolescent users, and the potential for therapeutic use, this work will be crucial to understanding abuse potential and consequences of use in this developmental stage.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAge FactorsAnimalsDextromethorphanFemaleHallucinogensHumansKetamineLysergic Acid DiethylamideMaleN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetaminePhencyclidinePsilocybinRisk-TakingSubstance-Related DisordersDextromethorphanHallucinogensKetamineLysergic Acid DiethylamideN-Methyl-3,4-methylenedioxyamphetaminePhencyclidinePsilocybinAdolescenceDissociativesMDMAPsychedelicsReward

Identifiers

PMID33515586
PMCPMC11578551
OpenAlexW3123680632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.