Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33515482›Full record

ArticleJournal of animal science2021

Effect of hay type on cecal and fecal microbiome and fermentation parameters in horses.

Rachel J Sorensen, James S Drouillard, Teresa L Douthit, Qinghong Ran, Douglas G Marthaler, Qing Kang, Christopher I Vahl, James M Lattimer

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of animal science, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Do Polish Konik Horses Find Soaked Hay to Be Palatable?Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Gut Microbiota of Ruminants and Monogastric Livestock: An Overview.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Dietary Energy Sources Affect Cecal and Fecal Microbiota of Healthy Horses.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Feeding aAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The OMICS of methane emissions.Journal of animal science · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rachel J SorensenDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
James S DrouillardDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
Teresa L DouthitDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
Qinghong RanDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
Douglas G MarthalerDepartment of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
Qing KangDepartment of Statistics, College of Arts and Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
Christopher I VahlDepartment of Statistics, College of Arts and Sciences, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
James M LattimerDepartment of Animal Sciences and Industry, College of Agriculture, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS.
Kansas State University · US

Funding

Kansas Agricultural Experiment StationKansas State University
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effect of hay type on the microbiome of the equine gastrointestinal tract is relatively unexplored. Our objective was to characterize the cecal and fecal microbiome of mature horses consuming alfalfa or Smooth Bromegrass (brome) hay. Six cecally cannulated horses were used in a split-plot design run as a crossover in two periods. The whole plot treatment was ad libitum access to brome or alfalfa hay fed over two 21-d acclimation periods with subplots of sampling location (cecum and rectum) and sampling hour. Each acclimation period was followed by a 24-h collection period where cecal and fecal samples were collected every 3 h for analysis of pH and volatile fatty acids (VFA). Fecal and cecal samples were pooled and sent to a commercial lab (MR DNA, Shallowater, TX) for the amplification of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene and sequenced using Illumina HiSeq. The main effects of hay on VFA, pH, and taxonomic abundances were analyzed using the MIXED procedure of SAS 9.4 with fixed effects of hay, hour, location, period, and all possible interactions and random effect of horse. Alpha and beta diversities were analyzed using the R Dame package. Horses fed alfalfa had greater fecal than cecal pH (P ≤ 0.05), whereas horses fed brome had greater cecal than fecal pH (P ≤ 0.05). Regardless of hay type, total VFA concentrations were greater (P ≤ 0.05) in the cecum than in feces, and alfalfa resulted in greater (P ≤ 0.05) VFA concentrations than brome in both sampling locations. Alpha diversity was greater (P ≤ 0.05) in fecal compared with cecal samples. Microbial community structure within each sampling location and hay type differed from one another (P ≤ 0.05). Bacteroidetes were greater (P ≤ 0.05) in the cecum compared with the rectum, regardless of hay type. Firmicutes and Firmicutes:Bacteroidetes were greater (P ≤ 0.05) in the feces compared with cecal samples of alfalfa-fed horses. In all, fermentation parameters and bacterial abundances were impacted by hay type and sampling location in the hindgut.

Indexed as

Animal FeedMicrobiotaAnimalsCecumDietFecesFermentationHorsesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 16Sbacteriafermentationhayhindguthorsemicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID33515482
PMCPMC7846146
OpenAlexW3114933559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.