ArticleInfectious diseases and therapy2021
The Kinetics of an Antibiotic Stewardship Intervention: A Quasi-Experimental Study.
Article in Infectious diseases and therapy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trial
- Trial
- Increased Use of Antibiotics in the Intensive Care Unit During Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic in a Brazilian Hospital.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLittle is known about the kinetics and different phases of a successful antibiotic stewardship program (ASP) intervention.
methodsWe analyzed the trends of quarterly antibiotic use measured in defined daily dose (DDD)/100 days hospitalization using the Joinpoint Regression Program and interrupted time series analysis to objectively identify shifts in the trends of antibiotic use. We correlated these changes in trends with the introduction of a hospital-wide ASP intervention.
resultsThe ASP intervention reduced the overall antibiotic use by 33%, from a prior steady state of 76.5 DDD/100 days hospitalization to a post-intervention steady state of 51.2 DDD/100 days hospitalization (p < 0.001). We identified four distinct phases in the trends: prior steady state (A), early intervention (B), accelerated phase (C), and post steady state (D). From A to B a change of slope (-1.46) [SE 0.37, 95% CI -2.23, -0.69 (p = 0.002)]; B to C, a further decrease of slope (-4.70) [SE 0.64, 95% CI -6.03, -3.37 (p = 0.001)]; between periods C and D, straightening out of the slope (+ 6.84) [SE 0.55, 95% CI 5.70, 7.98 (p < 0.001)] to a new post-intervention steady state. It took 1.5 years after completion of the intervention to reach the new steady state.
conclusionsWe demonstrate that ASP interventions require time to achieve the maximal effect. Successful interventions require physicians to adapt new prescribing behaviors and gain confidence in the change; this adaptation can be a prolonged process and might even take years after the introduction of the ASP. These factors should be considered when planning and implementing ASP interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.