Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33515346›Full record

ArticleAdministration and policy in mental health2021

Recidivism Treatment for Justice-Involved Veterans: Evaluating Adoption and Sustainment of Moral Reconation Therapy in the US Veterans Health Administration.

Daniel M Blonigen, Paige M Shaffer, Jennifer S Smith, Michael A Cucciare, Christine Timko, David Smelson, Jessica Blue-Howells, Sean Clark, Joel Rosenthal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Administration and policy in mental health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Expanding the Scope of Forensic and Other Services for Justice-Involved Veterans.The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Daniel M BlonigenHSR&D Center for Innovation to Implementation, Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto Health Care System, 795 Willow Road (152), Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA. daniel.blonigen@va.gov.ORCID 0000-0003-3420-6704
Paige M ShafferHSR&D Center for Health Care Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford VA Medical Center, Bedford, MA, USA.
Jennifer S SmithHSR&D Center for Innovation to Implementation, Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto Health Care System, 795 Willow Road (152), Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
Michael A CucciareHSR&D Center for Mental Healthcare and Outcomes Research, Central Arkansas Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, North Little Rock, AR, USA.
Christine TimkoHSR&D Center for Innovation to Implementation, Department of Veterans Affairs, Palo Alto Health Care System, 795 Willow Road (152), Menlo Park, CA, 94025, USA.
David SmelsonHSR&D Center for Health Care Organization and Implementation Research, Bedford VA Medical Center, Bedford, MA, USA.
Jessica Blue-HowellsVeterans Justice Programs, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA.
Sean ClarkVeterans Justice Programs, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA.
Joel RosenthalVeterans Justice Programs, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC, USA.

Funding

HSRD VA I01 HX001570HSRD VA IK6 HX003763HSRD VA RCS 00-001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Moral Reconation Therapy (MRT), an evidence-based intervention to reduce risk for criminal recidivism among justice-involved adults, was developed and primarily tested in correctional settings. Therefore, a better understanding of the implementation potential of MRT within non-correctional settings is needed. To address this gap in the literature, we evaluated the adoption and sustainment of MRT in the US Veterans Health Administration (VHA) following a national training initiative in fiscal years 2016 and 2017. In February 2019, surveys with 66 of the 78 VHA facilities that participated in the training were used to estimate the prevalence of MRT adoption and sustainment, and qualitative interviews with key informants from 20 facilities were used to identify factors associated with sustainment of MRT groups. Of the 66 facilities surveyed, the majority reported adopting (n = 52; 79%) and sustaining their MRT group until the time of the survey (n = 38; 58%). MRT sustainment was facilitated by strong intra-facility (e.g., between veterans justice and behavioral health services) and inter-agency collaborations (e.g., between VHA and criminal justice system stakeholders), which provided a reliable referral source to MRT groups, external incentives for patient engagement, and sufficient staffing to maintain groups. Additional facilitators of MRT sustainment were adaptations to the content and delivery of MRT for patients and screening of referrals to the groups. The findings provide guidance to clinics and healthcare systems that are seeking to implement MRT with justice-involved patient populations, and inform development of implementation strategies to be formally tested in future trials.

Indexed as

RecidivismVeteransAdultHumansMoralsUnited StatesUnited States Department of Veterans AffairsVeterans HealthAdoptionCriminal recidivismJustice-involved veteransMoral reconation therapySustainmentVeterans health administration

Identifiers

PMID33515346
PMCPMC7847225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.