ReviewPlant cell reports2021
Fruit crops in the era of genome editing: closing the regulatory gap.
Review in Plant cell reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reconfiguring biofortification strategies to transform food systems and address micronutrient deficiency of the 21st century.Journal of integrative plant biology · 2026Review
- Review
- In planta genome editing in citrus facilitated by co-expression of CRISPR/Cas and developmental regulators.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2025Article
- From data to decisions: a paradigm shift in fruit agriculture through the integration of multi-omics, modern phenotyping, and cutting-edge bioinformatic tools.Frontiers in plant science · 2025Review
- Recent developments, challenges and opportunities in genome editing for crop science from a societal perspective.Frontiers in genome editing · 2025Review
- Genomic consequences associated with Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of plants.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2024Review
- Adapting enzymes to improve their functionality in plants: why and how.Biochemical Society transactions · 2023Review
- Quality trait improvement in horticultural crops: OMICS and modern biotechnological approaches.Molecular biology reports · 2023Review
- Cut-dip-budding delivery system enables genetic modifications in plants without tissue culture.Innovation (Cambridge (Mass.)) · 2023Article
- Review
- Spontaneous, Artificial, and Genome Editing-Mediated Mutations inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Transgenic and genome-edited fruits: background, constraints, benefits, and commercial opportunities.Horticulture research · 2021Review
- Induced Genetic Variations in Fruit Trees Using New Breeding Tools: Food Security and Climate Resilience.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- CRISPR innovations in plant breeding.Plant cell reports · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The conventional breeding of fruits and fruit trees has led to the improvement of consumer-driven traits such as fruit size, yield, nutritional properties, aroma and taste, as well as the introduction of agronomic properties such as disease resistance. However, even with the assistance of modern molecular approaches such as marker-assisted selection, the improvement of fruit varieties by conventional breeding takes considerable time and effort. The advent of genetic engineering led to the rapid development of new varieties by allowing the direct introduction of genes into elite lines. In this review article, we discuss three such case studies: the Arctic
Indexed as
Identifiers
33515309What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.