ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021
Enzyme Promiscuity Prediction Using Hierarchy-Informed Multi-Label Classification.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Trust Beyond Accuracy: Conformal Uncertainty Quantification Reveals the Generalization Gap in Polymer Glass Transition Temperature Prediction.ACS omega · 2026Article
- A Comprehensive Review: Current Strategies for Detoxification of Deoxynivalenol in Feedstuffs for Pigs.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Review
- A multimodal Transformer Network for protein-small molecule interactions enhances predictions of kinase inhibition and enzyme-substrate relationships.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- Opportunities and Challenges for Machine Learning-Assisted Enzyme Engineering.ACS central science · 2024Review
- Short Peptides for Hydrolase Supramolecular Mimicry and Their Potential Applications.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- CSI: Contrastive data Stratification for Interaction prediction and its application to compound-protein interaction prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- A tripartite microbial co-culture system for de novo biosynthesis of diverse plant phenylpropanoids.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Recent advances in mass spectrometry-based computational metabolomics.Current opinion in chemical biology · 2023Review
- A general model to predict small molecule substrates of enzymes based on machine and deep learning.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Boost-RS: boosted embeddings for recommender systems and its application to enzyme-substrate interaction prediction.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationAs experimental efforts are costly and time consuming, computational characterization of enzyme capabilities is an attractive alternative. We present and evaluate several machine-learning models to predict which of 983 distinct enzymes, as defined via the Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers, are likely to interact with a given query molecule. Our data consists of enzyme-substrate interactions from the BRENDA database. Some interactions are attributed to natural selection and involve the enzyme's natural substrates. The majority of the interactions however involve non-natural substrates, thus reflecting promiscuous enzymatic activities.
resultsWe frame this "enzyme promiscuity prediction" problem as a multi-label classification task. We maximally utilize inhibitor and unlabelled data to train prediction models that can take advantage of known hierarchical relationships between enzyme classes. We report that a hierarchical multi-label neural network, EPP-HMCNF, is the best model for solving this problem, outperforming k-nearest neighbours similarity-based and other machine learning models. We show that inhibitor information during training consistently improves predictive power, particularly for EPP-HMCNF. We also show that all promiscuity prediction models perform worse under a realistic data split when compared to a random data split, and when evaluating performance on non-natural substrates compared to natural substrates. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: We provide Python code for EPP-HMCNF and other models in a repository termed EPP (Enzyme Promiscuity Prediction) at https://github.com/hassounlab/EPP. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.