ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2021
Fur: Find unique genomic regions for diagnostic PCR.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rapid detection of cultivated truffle fungi (Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026Article
- SURE-Pipe: a pipeline to compare genomes and extract shared and unique regions.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026Article
- Strain-Specific Loci in Bacterial Genomes: Whole-Genome Discovery, Genomic Context, and Application for Multi-Strain qPCR Monitoring.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Seqwin: ultrafast identification of signature sequences in microbial genomes.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Metagenomic analysis and proteins prediction of emerging pathogens in artisanal cheese.Molecular diversity · 2025Article
- Seqwin: Ultrafast identification of signature sequences in microbial genomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Laboratory validation of targeted next-generation sequencing assay for pathogen detection in lower respiratory infection.Microbiology spectrum · 2025Article
- Fast detection of unique genomic regions.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2025Review
- Advancing microbial diagnostics: a universal phylogeny guided computational algorithm to find unique sequences for precise microorganism detection.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Marker discovery in the large.Bioinformatics advances · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
motivationUnique marker sequences are highly sought after in molecular diagnostics. Nevertheless, there are only few programs available to search for marker sequences, compared to the many programs for similarity search. We therefore wrote the program Fur for Finding Unique genomic Regions.
resultsFur takes as input a sample of target sequences and a sample of closely related neighbors. It returns the regions present in all targets and absent from all neighbors. The recently published program genmap can also be used for this purpose and we compared it to fur. When analyzing a sample of 33 genomes representing the major phylogroups of E.coli, fur was 40 times faster than genmap but used three times more memory. On the other hand, genmap yielded three times more markers, but they were less accurate when tested in silico on a sample of 237 E.coli genomes. We also designed phylogroup-specific PCR primers based on the markers proposed by genmap and fur, and tested them by analyzing their virtual amplicons in GenBank. Finally, we used fur to design primers specific to a Lactobacillus species, and found excellent sensitivity and specificity in vitro. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Fur sources and documentation are available from https://github.com/evolbioinf/fur. The compiled software is posted as a docker container at https://hub.docker.com/r/haubold/fox. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.