SynthesisClinical pharmacokinetics2021
Oxycodone Effect on Pupil Constriction in Recreational Opioid Users: A Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Meta-Analysis Approach.
Synthesis in Clinical pharmacokinetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Applications of Model-Based Meta-Analysis in Drug Development.Pharmaceutical research · 2022Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUnderstanding the effect of oxycodone pharmacokinetics (PK) on µ-opioid receptor binding benefits from an integrated approach to compiling the results of multiple studies. The current pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model analysis brings together various studies to support the interpretation of newly collected PK/PD data, putting the new results into the perspective of the full concentration-effect curve.
methodsA two-step modeling approach was applied to characterize the PK of oxycodone and its PK/PD relationship for the pupil diameter as a biomarker for µ-opioid receptor binding in recreational opioid users. First, a model-based meta-analysis (MBMA) was used to quantify the state-of-the-art knowledge from seven published studies, each of which contained part of the data needed for full characterization. Subsequently, the estimated parameters with uncertainty from the MBMA were used as prior information for a model developed on newly collected clinical data after intranasal administration in a clinical abuse potential trial.
resultsThe inclusion of intravenous data in the MBMA showed that the PK of oxycodone can be described by a two-compartmental model, and allowed for the estimation of absolute bioavailability after intranasal and oral administration. A hysteresis loop was observed when plotting plasma concentrations and pupil constriction, which was approximated using an effect compartment. The totality of literature data enabled the identification of a Hill equation for the drug effect. The model with prior information fitted successfully to the newly collected data, where most parameter estimates had their confidence intervals overlapping with the prior distribution. The new data led to a slightly lower intranasal absorption rate constant, explaining the longer apparent half-life of oxycodone in the newly collected data. The PK/PD model parameters were confirmed by the new data, leading to the following estimates: half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC
conclusionsThe new data confirmed the PK profile and the PK/PD relationship identified using the MBMA, resulting in similar parameter estimates except for the intranasal absorption rate constant. The latter was lower than in the MBMA and explained the slightly longer apparent half-life of oxycodone in the newly collected data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.