ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2021
Perceptions of community pharmacists to implementing technologies in the workplace: an exploratory study.
Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Community Pharmacist Preferences for Providing a Dose Administration Aid Service in Australia: A Discrete Choice Experiment.PharmacoEconomics · 2026Article
- Utilization, perceived benefits and concerns regarding robotic technologies among community pharmacists.Future science OA · 2025Article
- The future of pharmacy work: How pharmacists are adapting to and preparing for technology infusion.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024Article
- Investigating the Usability, Efficacy and Accuracy of a Medication Entering Software System for a Healthcare Robot.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background The proliferation of different technologies in pharmacies has begun to change the role and work of pharmacists; however, while workplace integration of technologies has been shown to be beneficial, there are still barriers to their implementation. Few studies have investigated pharmacists' perceptions of these technologies. Objective To investigate the views of community pharmacists on the implementation of technologies in pharmacy practice. Setting Community pharmacies in Auckland, New Zealand. Methods Semi-structured interviews were conducted June-September 2018 with a convenience sample of 20 pharmacists. Interviews explored current medication management and technologies used to support this service, experiences with technologies, confidence in learning new technologies, and whether the introduction of technologies could solve any needs in pharmacy practice. Data were analysed using inductive thematic analysis. Main outcome measure Community pharmacists views on pharmacy technologies. Results Four key themes were identified: attitudes to existing medication management technologies, adapting to new technologies, acceptance of technology, and barriers to implementing technology in pharmacies. Pharmacists were accepting of technology to help with medication management and allowing them to provide more patient-centered care. Most pharmacists expressed confidence in using new technologies and viewed technology as a tool to address current limitations in their practice. Barriers to technology were cost, consequences of medication error, fear that technology may replace people, and an over-reliance on technology. Conclusion Community pharmacists made use of several types of technologies to promote medication management, including robotics. While mostly accepting of new technologies to streamline tasks and reduce error, pharmacists highlighted the importance of addressing barriers to technology implementation prior to workplace implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
33515134What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.