Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33515097›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2021

Clinical evaluation of commercial PCR assays for antimicrobal resistance in Mycoplasma genitalium and estimation of resistance-mediated mutation prevalence in Moscow and Moscow region.

Elizaveta Dmitrievna Shedko, Guzel Anvarovna Khayrullina, Elena Nikolaevna Goloveshkina, Vasiliy Gennadevich Akimkin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elizaveta Dmitrievna ShedkoFederal Budget Institution of Science "Central Research Institute of Epidemiology" of The Federal Service on Customers' Rights Protection and Human Well-being Surveillance, Moscow, Russia. shedko@cmd.su.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4556-7513
Guzel Anvarovna KhayrullinaFederal Budget Institution of Science "Central Research Institute of Epidemiology" of The Federal Service on Customers' Rights Protection and Human Well-being Surveillance, Moscow, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1544-0730
Elena Nikolaevna GoloveshkinaFederal Budget Institution of Science "Central Research Institute of Epidemiology" of The Federal Service on Customers' Rights Protection and Human Well-being Surveillance, Moscow, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0536-2874
Vasiliy Gennadevich AkimkinFederal Budget Institution of Science "Central Research Institute of Epidemiology" of The Federal Service on Customers' Rights Protection and Human Well-being Surveillance, Moscow, Russia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4228-9044
Central Research Institute of Epidemiology · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mycoplasma genitalium is a widespread sexually transmitted infection (STI) with growing rate of antimicrobials resistance. In our study, 137 vaginal and 131 urethral M. genitalium-positive swabs were sequentially collected through the work of Reference Center for STI during 2019. For prevalence evaluation of macrolide-resistance mutations three commercially available kits were used: AmpliSens® M. genitalium-ML/FQ-Resist-FL (Central Research Institute of Epidemiology, Russia), ResistancePlus® MG (SpeeDx, Australia), and S-DiaMGRes™ (Diagenode, Belgium). Macrolide resistance mutations were detected in 16% (43 of 268) of samples. Diagnostic characteristics were evaluated against Sanger sequencing. For AmpliSens® M. genitalium-ML/FQ-Resist-FL specificity was shown to be 100% (CI 95%, 98.4-100), and sensitivity was 90.7% (CI 95%, 77.9-97.4). ResistancePlus® MG specificity was 100% (CI 95%, 98.3-100), and sensitivity was 92.1% (CI 95%, 78.6-98.3). S-DiaMGRes™ specificity was shown to be 88.6% (CI 95%, 83.9-92.4), and sensitivity was 100% (CI 95%, 84.4-100). Mutations of parC gene region were detected in 14.5% (38 of 268) using AmpliSens® M. genitalium-ML/FQ-Resist-FL with further validation by Sanger sequencing. Of studied samples, 6.3% (17 of 268) contained both antimicrobials of class resistance mutations. Prevalence of macrolide-resistant M. genitalium in Moscow was 21.7% (23 of 106) and of fluoroquinolone-resistant M. genitaliuim was 20.8% (22 of 106). In Moscow region, macrolide-resistant M. genitalium were 12.3% (20 of 162) and 9.9% (16 of 162) of fluoroquinolone-resistant M. genitalium. All three kits can be used both for epidemiological monitoring of M. genitalium presence and mutation prevalence estimation. In Moscow, macrolide- and fluoroquinolone-resistant mutant prevalence increased in 3.9 and 2.7 times in 3 years.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansMaleMoscowMycoplasma genitaliumMycoplasma InfectionsPolymerase Chain ReactionSexually Transmitted Diseases, BacterialAnti-Bacterial Agents23S rRNAAntibiotic resistance gene determinantsFluoroquinoloneMacrolideMolecular diagnosticsMycoplasma genitaliumPCRQRDR

Identifiers

PMID33515097
OpenAlexW3121851583

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.