Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33515058›Full record

ArticleChild's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery2021

Machine learning predicts risk of cerebrospinal fluid shunt failure in children: a study from the hydrocephalus clinical research network.

Andrew T Hale, Jay Riva-Cambrin, John C Wellons, Eric M Jackson, John R W Kestle, Robert P Naftel, Todd C Hankinson, Chevis N Shannon, Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Ventriculoperitoneal shunt failures at Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Andrew T HaleMedical Scientist Training Program, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 2200 Pierce Ave., Light Hall 514, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA. andrew.hale@vanderbilt.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3182-2966
Jay Riva-CambrinDepartment of Clinical Neurosciences, Alberta Children's Hospital, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
John C WellonsSurgical Outcomes Center for Kids, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital of Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Eric M JacksonDepartment of Neurosurgery, Johns Hopkins Children's Center, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
John R W KestleDepartment of Neurosurgery, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Robert P NaftelSurgical Outcomes Center for Kids, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital of Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Todd C HankinsonDivision of Pediatric Neurosurgery, Children's Hospital Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Chevis N ShannonSurgical Outcomes Center for Kids, Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital of Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWhile conventional statistical approaches have been used to identify risk factors for cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) shunt failure, these methods may not fully capture the complex contribution of clinical, radiologic, surgical, and shunt-specific variables influencing this outcome. Using prospectively collected data from the Hydrocephalus Clinical Research Network (HCRN) patient registry, we applied machine learning (ML) approaches to create a predictive model of CSF shunt failure.

methodsPediatric patients (age < 19 years) undergoing first-time CSF shunt placement at six HCRN centers were included. CSF shunt failure was defined as a composite outcome including requirement for shunt revision, endoscopic third ventriculostomy, or shunt infection within 5 years of initial surgery. Performance of conventional statistical and 4 ML models were compared.

resultsOur cohort consisted of 1036 children undergoing CSF shunt placement, of whom 344 (33.2%) experienced shunt failure. Thirty-eight clinical, radiologic, surgical, and shunt-design variables were included in the ML analyses. Of all ML algorithms tested, the artificial neural network (ANN) had the strongest performance with an area under the receiver operator curve (AUC) of 0.71. The ANN had a specificity of 90% and a sensitivity of 68%, meaning that the ANN can effectively rule-in patients most likely to experience CSF shunt failure (i.e., high specificity) and moderately effective as a tool to rule-out patients at high risk of CSF shunt failure (i.e., moderately sensitive). The ANN was independently validated in 155 patients (prospectively collected, retrospectively analyzed).

conclusionThese data suggest that the ANN, or future iterations thereof, can provide an evidence-based tool to assist in prognostication and patient-counseling immediately after CSF shunt placement.

Indexed as

Cerebrospinal Fluid ShuntsHydrocephalusAdultChildHumansInfantMachine LearningRetrospective StudiesVentriculostomyYoung AdultArtificial intelligenceCSF shunt failureHCRNHydrocephalusMachine learning

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.