Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33514790›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

LC-MS based case-by-case analysis of the impact of acidic and basic charge variants of bevacizumab on stability and biological activity.

Sumit Kumar Singh, Deepak Kumar, Himanshu Malani, Anurag S Rathore

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sumit Kumar SinghDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Deepak KumarDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Himanshu MalaniDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India.
Anurag S RathoreDepartment of Chemical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Hauz Khas, New Delhi, 110016, India. asrathore@biotechcmz.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study investigates the impact of charge variants on bevacizumab's structure, stability, and biological activity. Five basic and one acidic charge variants were separated using semi-preparative cation exchange chromatography using linear pH gradient elution with purity > 85%. Based on the commercial biosimilar product's composition, two basic variants, one acidic and the main bevacizumab product, were chosen for further investigation. Intact mass analysis and tryptic peptide mapping established the basic variants' identity as those originating from an incomplete clipping of either one or both C-terminal lysine residues in the heavy chain of bevacizumab. Based on peptide mapping data, the acidic variant formation was attributed to deamidation of asparagine residue (N84), oxidation of M258, and preservation of C-terminal lysine residue, located on the heavy chain of bevacizumab. None of the observed charge heterogeneities in bevacizumab were due to differences in glycosylation among the variants. The basic (lysine) variants exhibited similar structural, functional, and stability profiles as the bevacizumab main product. But it was also noted that both the variants did not improve bevacizumab's therapeutic utility when pooled in different proportions with the main product. The acidic variant was found to have an equivalent secondary structure with subtle differences in the tertiary structure. The conformational difference also translated into a ~ 62% decrease in biological activity. Based on these data, it can be concluded that different charge variants behave differently with respect to their structure and bioactivity. Hence, biopharmaceutical manufacturers need to incorporate this understanding into their process and product development guidelines to maintain consistency in product quality.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBevacizumabBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsCell ProliferationCHO CellsChromatography, Ion ExchangeCricetulusDrug StabilityGlycosylationHumansHuman Umbilical Vein Endothelial CellsHydrogen-Ion ConcentrationMass SpectrometryPeptide MappingProtein StabilityAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalBevacizumabBiosimilar PharmaceuticalsVascular Endothelial Growth Factor AVEGFA protein, human

Identifiers

PMID33514790
PMCPMC7846745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.