ArticleScientific reports2021
Peat deposits store more carbon than trees in forested peatlands of the boreal biome.
Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Contrasting Trait-Mediated Mechanisms Shape Peatland Testate Amoeba Communities Under Long-Term Drying Across Fen-Bog Gradient.Microbial ecology · 2026Article
- Beyond the forests: peatlands as overlooked carbon stores in coastal British Columbia.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Fostering Peat Moss Feedbacks to Accelerate Peatland Restoration.Global change biology · 2026Review
- Do current biomass equations for Alnus glutinosa and Betula pubescens misestimate carbon stocks at peatland sites?Carbon balance and management · 2026Article
- Iron stimulates greenhouse gas production in Southeast Asian peatlands.ISME communications · 2026Article
- Towards a remote sensing-based assessment of carbon emissions from peatlands.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Defining the relationship between bulk density and organic carbon content in forest soils using generalised linear mixed-effect models.Carbon balance and management · 2025Article
- A role for dendroecology in guiding hydrologic restoration and mitigating risks of peatland soil loss: an example fromTrees (Berlin, Germany : West) · 2025Article
- Greening of a boreal rich fen driven by COAgricultural and forest meteorology · 2024Article
- Active afforestation of drained peatlands is not a viable option under the EU Nature Restoration Law.Ambio · 2024Review
- Galyean appreciation club review: a holistic perspective of the societal relevance of beef production and its impacts on climate change.Journal of animal science · 2023Article
- Fuel layer specific pollutant emission factors for fire prone forest ecosystems of the western U.S. and Canada.Atmospheric Environment: X · 2022Article
- Maximizing the effectiveness of national commitments to protected area expansion for conserving biodiversity and ecosystem carbon under climate change.Global change biology · 2021Review
- Paludification reduces black spruce growth rate but does not alter tree water use efficiency in Canadian boreal forested peatlands.Forest ecosystems · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peatlands are significant carbon (C) stores, playing a key role in nature-based climate change mitigation. While the effectiveness of non-forested peatlands as C reservoirs is increasingly recognized, the C sequestration function of forested peatlands remains poorly documented, despite their widespread distribution. Here, we evaluate the C sequestration potential of pristine boreal forested peatlands over both recent and millennial timescales. C stock estimates reveal that most of the carbon stored in these ecosystems is found in organic horizons (22.6-66.0 kg m
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.